CharlestonGal
Former Member
- Joined
- Jan 21, 2009
- Messages
- 5,857
- Reaction score
- 47,452
So a purely voluntary statement of details relating to the crime would be entertained? That's how it is over here; even after someone is charged, if they request to speak to LE it is generally granted. The suspect has the right for counsel to be present, but that can be waived, too. We generally let them talk all they want to, especially if they are confessing and providing details.Once a suspect has been charged with the offence under investigation, he should not be questioned further in relation to the offence, unless such questions are absolutely necessary in order to:
(Paragraph 16.5, PACE Code C (Revised))
- Prevent or minimise harm or loss to some other person or to the public.
- Clarify an ambiguity in a previous answer or statement.
- Provide the suspect with an opportunity to comment on information concerning the offence which has since come to light where it is in the interests of justice to do so.
If a suspect is to be interviewed again he should be cautioned again. He should also be reminded that he has a right to seek legal advice.
Terrorism legislation provides for application to the Crown Court for further interview after charge.
I'm still not convinced this boy acted alone. I think someone/someones helped him, at the very least after the fact. Those people, if they exist, are probably a threat to the public, too, and should be behind bars.