Hi everyone - first time I’ve posted anything , please be gentle with me. I’ve been following this trial (both trials) from the beginning and I find all your comments very interesting. My feeling is the defence summing up made a lot of the defendant’s autism, but he must have been examined before going to trial and thought fit and able to stand trial in a Crown Court. If I was on the jury I’d be feeling this is unfair to say that it is now a factor. Also they started to “suggest” that LB was meeting someone she knew, how can they do that if it wasn’t presented as evidence?! I’ve been called for Jury Service three times! Once to the Old Bailey during the time the Levi Bellfield trial was going on (although I wasn’t on that jury). In my experience a decision takes 2 - 6 hours, but I’ve not been on a jury for a trial as complicated as this. I’m hoping LB’s family get the justice they deserve.