
Remove violent content seen by Southport killer now, says Reeves
Material seen by Southport murderer Axel Rudakubana should be removed by tech firms, the chancellor says.
www.bbc.co.uk
Noting that a rumour was circulating that he was beaten up in jail, afaik, apparently it is not true.
If they really want to torture him without the use of violence, inmates could dress him up - or be dressed themselves as ''Swifties'', play her music and dance around him. imo, speculation.
26th Jan 2025![]()
Southport killer Axel Rudakubana allegedly beaten up by prison inmates
Unconfirmed reports are swirling on social media that Southport killer Axel Rudakubana has been beaten up by inmates.www.lep.co.uk
''Unconfirmed reports are swirling on social media that Southport killer Axel Rudakubana has been beaten up by inmates.''
''The audio recording implied that two prisoners were permitted into Rudakubana's cell and assaulted him. However, the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) later confirmed to the Mirror that these claims were false and that Rudakubana had not been attacked.''![]()
Axel Rudakubana not attacked in prison after being sentenced to 52 years
An audio recording doing the rounds on social media suggested that two inmates were allowed into Axel Rudakubana's cell, where they carried out an attack on the 18-year-oldwww.birminghammail.co.uk
He had looked up a variety of terrorist attacks around the world. He had planned to go back to his school and carry out an attack which I doubt would be just an attack on just girls.Jan 27 2025
''Southport killer Axel Rudakubana launched his horror knife rampage out of an 'incel' hatred of women, classmates have claimed, while his father refused to introduce him to a family friend.''![]()
Southport killer Axel Rudakubana targeted girls due to hatred of women
Rudakubana, 18, was last week sentenced to life in prison with a minimum term of 52 years for the murders of three young girls at a Taylor Swift-themed dance class on July 29.www.dailymail.co.uk
''Now his former classmates have described him as an 'incel' who refused to speak to girls at school and who targeted the dance class in order to kill as many as possible.
Incels - or involuntary celibates - are typically single men who blame women for the problems in their lives''.
Consecutive sentences are rare here. I can't actually recall one, tbh.And I don't get
why the sentence for "ricin producing"
(18 years if IRC)
was decided to run concurrently.
It was a different crime,
so I thought it should be consecutive.
Ummm....
But then it would be 70 year sentenceOoops!
But I'm OK with 52 year sentence.
Although "poison sentence" is symbolic
as it is concurrent.
JMO
The only one I can think of is Pawel Relowicz, Libby Squire's murder. He received consecutive sentences for his sex crimes before also being convicted of Libby's murder.Consecutive sentences are rare here. I can't actually recall one, tbh.
The only one I can think of is Pawel Relowicz, Libby Squire's murder. He received consecutive sentences for his sex crimes before also being convicted of Libby's murder.
![]()
Polish butcher who spied on woman having sex is jailed
Pawel Relowicz, who lives in Hull, has been living in the UK for seven years and is a father of two. He admitted three counts of burglary, four of voyeurism and two of outraging public decency.www.dailymail.co.uk
From article.
'Relowicz appeared to be on the verge of tears as he was handed an eight-year and six-month jail term at Sheffield Crown Court.
For each count of voyeurism he was given 15 months to run consecutively totalling five years imprisonment.'
It does, as you say, seem very rare indeed.
Doesn't he give the aggravating and mitigating factors for counts 1-3 in points 30 and 31. Basically, the aggravating factors are so enormous that they allowed the judge to pretty much double the sentence from the starting point.R -v- Axel Rudakubana - Courts and Tribunals Judiciary
Liverpool Crown Court 23 January 2025 Before: Mr Justice Goose Between: R -v- Axel Rudakubana Sentencing notewww.judiciary.uk
Can anyone shed any light on how, exactly, the judge arrived at the sentences he gave as it doesn't seem to have any logic to it?
30. The Starting Point in deciding the minimum term in custody on Counts 1 – 3,must be 27 years, because he was 17 years old when he murdered Elsie, Bebe and Alice...
43. I am now going to sentence Axel Rudakubana, having explained my reasons.• On Counts 1 – 3, Murder, I sentence him to Custody for Life with a minimum term which he must serve in custody of 52 years, less the time he has already served. He has been in custody for 175 days on remand for which he will be credited. Therefore, the minimum term is 51 years and190 days
The judge doesn't explain precisely how he starts from 27 years and arrives at 52 years.
38. For each of the offences where he attempted to murder a child, being Counts 4 –11, the appropriate sentence guideline is category A2 with a Starting Point forsentence of 30 years, with a range up to 35 years. The very young age of each victim and the substantial planning by him, requires me to increase that sentence to the top of the range, before reducing it, to reflect his age, his late guilty plea and to reach the minimum term for these offences. Accordingly, I firstly reduce the sentence to 30 years for his age and 27 years for the guilty plea,leading to a minimum term of 18 years on each of Counts 4 – 11 concurrently.
This, on the face of it makes zero sense. If the starting point is 27 years then what was his reasoning for reducing it to 18 years?
I was under the impression that judges must give reasons as to why they arrived at the sentences they hand down. He hasn't done so, though.
He doesn't explain how he arrived at 52 years, though. Why 52 rather than 50 or 55? The figure he handed down was way, way more than the starting point so there must be some logic behind it. As it stands it seems as though he simply plucked a number out of thin air because there is no explanation for. He hasn't shown his workings, if you see what I mean?Doesn't he give the aggravating and mitigating factors for counts 1-3 in points 30 and 31. Basically, the aggravating factors are so enormous that they allowed the judge to pretty much double the sentence from the starting point.
This one from the end of last year. Parents got consecutive sentences for one child who died, and his brother who survived with life changing medical needs. Horrible case, consecutive sentences well and truly deserved!Consecutive sentences are rare here. I can't actually recall one, tbh.