VERDICT WATCH UK - Nurse Lucy Letby, Faces 22 Charges - 7 Murder/15 Attempted Murder of Babies #29

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #321
  • #322
Tumbleweed
 
  • #323
Spoke too soon. Jury back and we are ON.
 
  • #324
It’s on, Dan just tweeted
 
  • #325
Dan O'Donoghue

@MrDanDonoghue
·
27s

Jurors at the trial of nurse Lucy Letby will continue their deliberations today. They have so far been discussing the case for 20hours in a room at Manchester Crown Court - today is their sixth day of deliberation (after a break last week)















Dan O'Donoghue

@MrDanDonoghue
·
14s

Prosecutors have alleged that from June 2015 to June 2016, Ms Letby murdered seven babies and attempted to kill a further 10 on the Countess of Chester Hospital's neonatal unit. The 33-year-old has denied all charges.


He just wanted everyone on their toes
 
  • #326
:)
Told you so :p
 
  • #327
  • #328
I think they are going to get a lot done today. I bet the jurors are more than ready to get their lives back and will try to get this finished as efficiently as possible.
 
  • #329
I agree. They have had a full week to process and refresh.
 
  • #330
I think the verdicts are done - unanimously.

Only the paperwork - mundane task - is to be done.

My Opinion ;)
 
Last edited:
  • #331
There's no way I could sit in a room with a bunch of people for eight months listening to this intense subject matter and not fall out with at least one of them - by which I mean never want to see them again, never mind tomorrow at 9am. And I'm a super chill, easy going, conciliatory, 'blessed are the peacemakers', type person who can withstand the absolute most amount of madness and conflict imaginable.

I can only but suspect the sorts of things that could go on between people and what sort of dynamics could arise. They could be in some form of conflict resolution or investigation. God forbid this jury were to be dismissed...
All IMHO but imagine if as they all sat down 4 said right she defo G (or NG) let’s get this done and get on with our lives and others of different views / characters said No - This is a complex trial, we’ve sat for 9 months . We’ll be going through charge by charge.

Bound to cause tension.
 
  • #332
Is this wording strange, or am I overthinking?

But on Monday, July 17, trial judge Mr Justice James Goss said only 10 of the 12 jurors were present, and that meant no deliberations could take place.

Ultimately, no deliberations took place last week.

However, on Monday, July 24, the trial judge allowed deliberations to resume at 10.30am.


 
  • #333
Is this wording strange, or am I overthinking?

But on Monday, July 17, trial judge Mr Justice James Goss said only 10 of the 12 jurors were present, and that meant no deliberations could take place.

Ultimately, no deliberations took place last week.

However, on Monday, July 24, the trial judge allowed deliberations to resume at 10.30am.


Yep, sounds like maybe he is going with only 10 or 11 jurors from now on. We may have lost one or two?
 
  • #334
All IMHO but imagine if as they all sat down 4 said right she defo G (or NG) let’s get this done and get on with our lives and others of different views / characters said No - This is a complex trial, we’ve sat for 9 months . We’ll be going through charge by charge.

Bound to cause tension.
Yep. I am thinking that they may end up with verdicts on SOME of the charges and others may be unable to be reached.
 
  • #335
I am really curious to hear if they have any questions for the judge or have any requests from the court before they get started?
 
  • #336
Is this wording strange, or am I overthinking?

But on Monday, July 17, trial judge Mr Justice James Goss said only 10 of the 12 jurors were present, and that meant no deliberations could take place.

Ultimately, no deliberations took place last week.

However, on Monday, July 24, the trial judge allowed deliberations to resume at 10.30am.



Yes when reading it in full it does sound odd ..."allowed" ?
 
  • #337
  • #338
  • #339
Is this wording strange, or am I overthinking?

But on Monday, July 17, trial judge Mr Justice James Goss said only 10 of the 12 jurors were present, and that meant no deliberations could take place.

Ultimately, no deliberations took place last week.

However, on Monday, July 24, the trial judge allowed deliberations to resume at 10.30am.


I don't think it's normal wording. It suggests to me some kind of decision. But I have a feeling they are still 12 because I don't see why they couldn't report a reduction in number.
 
  • #340
Yes when reading it in full it does sound odd ..."allowed" ?
Right, and it didn't say "However all 12 jurors were here this morning."

It said 'However, the judge allowed deliberation this morning"

So it sounds like he changed criteria today so he could get back on track? IMO
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
83
Guests online
2,537
Total visitors
2,620

Forum statistics

Threads
632,795
Messages
18,631,827
Members
243,294
Latest member
Safeplace07
Back
Top