• #2,521
No, Letby didn't know that Jayaram would discover the paper on air embolism but the fact is, she was causing air embolisms.

So she knew that, they might realise what
was happening. The bung, gives the suggestion that an accidental air embolism could happen on the unit.
She did not want a purposely done, injected air embolism to look like a possiblity on a baby in her care.

Datix 1. Shows how an accidental air embolism could occur on the unit.

Datix 2. Loss of peripheral access,
All of which comes from the mouth of Letby and is called untrue by Breary. Shown in court to be a load of BS with zero evidence.
Letby is the cause of this false datix being filed.
No peripheral access, means no injected air.

Those 2 Datix served a purpose, to a very clearly panicked Letby.

A bit like lying about CPAP on the notes and claiming not to remember why she did it. It would potentially explain why baby O was full of air.
I thought air going in an NG tube is what causes tummies and bowels to be full of air, not a long line. Isn’t that what we’ve all learned?

The point of the datix was that they had to go up to the children’s ward to get the equipment needed for the IO access. The reason for the IO access was because they couldn’t get blood from the existing access.

It’s quite remarkable seeing how this is being twisted into somehow showing that deliberate harm was caused.
 
  • #2,522
Joltz is correct, Letby was the first one to mention anything about AE.

Why did she bring it up before anyone else?

She brought it up in an attempt at creating an alibi because she'd been causing them!
 
  • #2,523
"I wouldn't do a thing like that, see MY datix i warn against them". Basic just of it.
 
  • #2,524
And you’re all sure there were no other instances of open bungs in 2015/16?
 

Guardians Monthly Goal

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
292
Guests online
6,156
Total visitors
6,448

Forum statistics

Threads
642,731
Messages
18,789,322
Members
245,008
Latest member
lobotomywife
Back
Top