GUILTY UK - Nurse Lucy Letby, murder of babies, 7 Guilty of murder verdicts; 8 Guilty of attempted murder; 2 Not Guilty of attempted; 5 hung re attempted #38

[marynnu]

We all see things differently and to me it just screams arrested development.

It doesn't. A little different, but my teddy bear is currently wearing his winter hat & is wrapped in a blanket. I can't settle if he looks uncomfortable. And yes, it's insane.

 

[Dotta]

It doesn't. A little different, but my teddy bear is currently wearing his winter hat & is wrapped in a blanket. I can't settle if he looks uncomfortable. And yes, it's insane.

And I still have this pink blanket with little cats hehehe
Oops

 

[Sweeper2000]

Tbh I think it can mean many things. A sense of comfort, nostalgia, belonging, and in certain cases yes arrested development.

The former royalty, Andrew the rightfully discarded is a prominent case. At his age demanding servants have his collection of toys and Teddy bears arranged very particularly and totally melting if they aren't. Tantrums and meltdowns. Deserving of a stiff one if you get my meaning.

 

[Parker Knoll]

I love these stories HOWEVER you are not typing them in from HMP Bronzefield because you are serving WLO’s !

 

[marynnu]

I love these stories HOWEVER you are not typing them in from HMP Bronzefield because you are serving WLO’s !

And you know this how?

 

[Sweeper2000]

Lol

 

[Parker Knoll]

It’s just a wild guess Mary !

 

[Sweeper2000]

It’s just a wild guess Mary !

I don't think that's her real name

 

[Parker Knoll]

Possibly sweep … I wasn’t named after a 70’s furniture company either !

 

[marynnu]

I don't think that's her real name

It's my middle name.

 

[Dotta]

https://twitter.com/x/status/2016927565181489391

 

[Sweeper2000]

It's my middle name.

Oh I thought your middle name was "ruddy mysterious".

 

[Sweeper2000]

Interesting article dotta, I wonder what documents they are referring to and who (assuming private access) handed them over. It could be Dr Mike Hall as featured in the article but it doesn't say that.

That article really does point it out. Last x Ray for baby I was taken 40 minutes before her tragic collapse shows no signs of pneumonia.

Really is a very weak argument from MM. I think he's just pointing out that yes it was present in the hospital unit including on clinical items and hoping this is enough to have impact. What nobody seems to have been able to do is meaningfully contest the prosecutions arguments including on this occasion. Or even make a strong argument for it affecting the babies. The fact the original defences expert has ruled it out means something as well. How on earth does mm think he can avoid that? Is he just hoping it does not get mentioned?

 

[Marantz4250b]

What dya reckon M. You think the ccrc will release their verdict soon? I'm really hoping they do because I have not seen anything approaching the level of strength qnecessary to really challenge it. That seems like their hottest piece and it's flimsy. If they had anything better they would have shown it by now no doubt.

As I said upthread, if they had anything that would blow open the case and prove her innocence (or even anything actually new, anything at all), MM would be hiring Wembley area for the presser and leaning on Springsteen to write a preachy song about her!

They have nothing. Absolutely nothing what-so-ever. It's all smoke and mirrors.

 

[Sweeper2000]

As I said upthread, if they had anything that would blow open the case and prove her innocence (or even anything actually new, anything at all), MM would be hiring Wembley area for the presser and leaning on Springsteen to write a preachy song about her!

They have nothing. Absolutely nothing what-so-ever. It's all smoke and mirrors.

Let's hope the ccrc see it that way as well and it's a more or less open and shut case fir them. Tbh I would gain quite a lot of satisfaction from seeing that, such posturing dismissed at the first hurdle.