• #2,501
She was being directly asked if she knew about air embolisms.



"And what about air embolisms, Lucy, did you receive any training in relation to those?"



"No"



"Okay, were you aware of them"



"Not really, no"



But she was aware of them wasn't she, she had been filing datix about the potential for them happening. She answered questions about them in her training.



She knew exactly what an air embolism was and she knew about the dangers of them. It was part of her training. Every nurse knows about them.



Letbys evasiveness over perfectly reasonable questions is alarming.



And in regards to the bung. Letby is the source for this. She told the Dr, who told the nurse, who text Letby. It all goes back to Letby.

No other person involved saw a missing bung.

If Letby did apparently see a missing bung, why did she wait 7 days to file a datix on it?


If Letby did apparently see a missing bung, why didn't she mention it in the reminder note that she wrote to herself, about the 2 datix, she went on to submit.
Not a single mention of the apparent missing bung she found, which could cause an air embolism. Instead she waits 7 days to do so, and does it on the same day she finds out about the consultants concerns.
I see you missed out the word “or” there. The police said; “ok, were you aware of them, or

And she replied: “not really, no”

She then answers about what she’s experienced on the unit, having already said there no training on air embolism.

This missing bung? What is your suggestion here? That she told the doctor about it with the intention it was going to be kept secret between them, and only when it wasn’t was she forced to submit a datix?
 
  • #2,502
Think your either deliberately eluding the point or missing it. Air embolism training comes as standard for the level she's at. Its an inherent part of iv, central etc line training. No way she didnt know all there was to know about it
 
  • #2,503
Think your either deliberately eluding the point or missing it. Air embolism training comes as standard for the level she's at. Its an inherent part of iv, central etc line training. No way she didnt know all there was to know about it
Right, exactly. She also answered no to “insulin training”, but we all know that also forms part of general training. And prior to getting to these questions, she’d already outlined the training she’s received.

Obviously she doesn’t know “all there is to know” about air embolism, I think it’s pretty clear nobody does given the absolute mess of this case. Nurses know to ensure air doesn’t get inside the circulation, probably learned it on Day 1, I doubt many of them could offer any further expertise on it.
 
  • #2,504
Letby received additional training on giving medication through lines, a few weeks before baby A. Part of this training was about the dangers of air embolism, Letby had documented this in her work book.
 
  • #2,505
Right, exactly. She also answered no to “insulin training”, but we all know that also forms part of general training. And prior to getting to these questions, she’d already outlined the training she’s received.

Obviously she doesn’t know “all there is to know” about air embolism, I think it’s pretty clear nobody does given the absolute mess of this case. Nurses know to ensure air doesn’t get inside the circulation, probably learned it on Day 1, I doubt many of them could offer any further expertise on it.
Yeh gain i think your missing it. I meant all there is to know from a nurses pov. Obviously all the ins and outs aren't relevant but a applicable clinical level if knowledge would have been mandatory at her level. Saying you don't really know anything about a subject you know 98% of is Obviously suspicious in this context. She even if being honest doesn't fill in the blanks here either ie " i know to clear the lines, I know how dangerous it is, I know its routine practice to avoid doing such things, clamp the lines, tap the lift the syringe to remove all air and etc" to assume its a request for complete knowledge is just ridiculous. She's very knowledgeable about everything else and forthcoming with it but not about that so why? Same with the insulin
 

Guardians Monthly Goal

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
371
Guests online
1,558
Total visitors
1,929

Forum statistics

Threads
642,586
Messages
18,787,344
Members
244,982
Latest member
princessbuttercup70
Back
Top