• #2,541
Yes my mind is currently shut down to prospect of anyone being guilty, because currently I’m not persuaded any crimes occurred on the unit.
I appreciate your POV and the discussion you bring, you certainly make me think, even if I don’t always agree. There is a definite irony to the people who are adamant she was found guilty in court asking if you are unable to see a different POV. I’m pretty certain when she was initially found guilty most people accepted that verdict until the Thirlwall inquiry started. Even the press conference didn’t shift a lot of people’s opinions- but it did get people to look a bit more closely.
 
  • #2,542
Its an option that the handovers may have been given to someone else at the end of shifts maybe so they could copy what was on there or something like that, officially and by the authorised person. Explaining why some were there and others not, and why some with the babies names in the charges but from different dates.

As a side note and this might eb a clue. The dates of incidents marked in her diaries, do they correlate with babies whose names were missing from the handovers or something along those lines?
 
  • #2,543
Letby received additional training on giving medication through lines, a few weeks before baby A. Part of this training was about the dangers of air embolism, Letby had documented this in her work book.
I don’t disagree, but can you please link the evidence
 
  • #2,544

Attachments

  • Screenshot_2026-02-18-21-22-26-81_40deb401b9ffe8e1df2f1cc5ba480b12~2.webp
    Screenshot_2026-02-18-21-22-26-81_40deb401b9ffe8e1df2f1cc5ba480b12~2.webp
    189.6 KB · Views: 5
  • Screenshot_2026-02-18-21-11-04-09_40deb401b9ffe8e1df2f1cc5ba480b12~2.webp
    Screenshot_2026-02-18-21-11-04-09_40deb401b9ffe8e1df2f1cc5ba480b12~2.webp
    83.5 KB · Views: 5
  • #2,545
As a side note and this might eb a clue. The dates of incidents marked in her diaries, do they correlate with babies whose names were missing from the handovers or something along those lines?
RSBM

We only know of asterisks in the 2015 diary: one week in August had 4 asterisks, two of which corresponded with the relevant dates babies E & F. She had a handover sheet from 31 July which listed E & F.

What we know of the 2016 diary, is the “LD - twins (resus)” relates to L & M. She had two handover sheets for them, one from two weeks later and the other six weeks later.

The 2016 diary also listed babies O and P (“LD plus initials”). She did have the corresponding handover sheets for those dates.
 

Guardians Monthly Goal

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
308
Guests online
4,115
Total visitors
4,423

Forum statistics

Threads
643,009
Messages
18,792,831
Members
245,050
Latest member
CharacterCat
Back
Top