G.
Dragon added info to 1st Nov report:
"A
cricket bat
also seized from the home was found to have Sara’s DNA profile on it,
along with the DNA sample of
Urfan Sharif and Faisal Malik.
Both items had no DNA trace of Beinash Batool on them.
(a belt, a cricket bat)
The court heard how Sara’s DNA was a match for blood found inside a carrier bag at the home address,
as well as on the handles of the bag and on a piece of brown tape.
Hairs found in this
exhibit were also a match for Sara.
It was also highlighted to the jury
that Beinash Batool was the only defendant who had refused to
provide dental impressions of her teeth to be compared with bite marks found on Sara.
At one point,
a member of the jury asked if an electric iron found at Sara’s family home had been tested for fingerprints or DNA.
It was explained that although it was swabbed for DNA,
the results were inconclusive.
The iron was not tested for fingerprints because, as an ordinary household item likely handled by multiple people, it would not have had evidential value."
Guildford News
guildford-dragon.com