- Joined
- Aug 9, 2012
- Messages
- 6,733
- Reaction score
- 66,476

Inexperienced social worker did not identify Sara Sharif’s father as posing any risk
The murdered girl had been allowed to live with her father, who had repeatedly attracted the attention of police and social workers
The social worker’s report, described as “very thorough”, was submitted as evidence ahead of a final hearing in 2019 at which a senior judge made the ultimate decision that Sara should live with her father, Urfan Sharif, and stepmother, Beinash Batool, who were last week found guilty of murdering the 10-year-old schoolgirl.
The document, which was shared with the press following an unprecedented disclosure of private court papers, failed to provide any analysis of the harm posed by Sharif despite listing a string of allegations made against him between 2010 and 2015.
Now the Observer can reveal the author was allocated the complex case in July 2019 only nine months after starting their employment with Surrey county council (SCC), having gained their social work qualification two years earlier.
It raises serious questions as to why Surrey did not place the burden of such a sensitive case involving an extremely volatile family with a more experienced staff member.
Surrey’s children’s services department was tasked with preparing the report before a hearing on 9 October 2019 by which point Sara was no longer living with her mother, Olga Domin, 38. The children had already moved to live with Sharif and Batool because, according to Sharif, Sara told him she was being abused by Domin.