UK UK - Suzy Lamplugh, 25, Fulham, 28 Jul 1986 #7

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #681
Al



Also the car needed to be @ 123 st why? Because one perp knew the comings and goings of the neighbours and knew how sharp they were, maybe chat and realised they were clever who would know that? Someone selling the local property! I know it is a big jump but you have to have a reason for the car being there the only risk is someone seeing you abandon the car so i would guess a female as you would match a vague description if seen so if i go with my thinking it is a man and a woman.
Totally agree with you - the fact that it was abandoned outside a sturgis property was massively significant ....the black left have drive BMW that a jogger witnessed with the woman screaming or laughing ( woman blowing the horn) was also seen in Stevenage RD NR BISHOPS PARK - surely this cant be coincidence! and the van driver that was nearly hit by a white fiesta driving at high speed and all over the rd ..really - are all these coincidences ?
 
Last edited:
  • #682
If sjl turned right out of the office either she was getting sandwiches using aphone box or bank machine,if buying sandwiches then i would guess she would have taken them back into work before going to her car which she would have to walk past her office to get to, she supposedly did not do that so if abducted before then if it was random jc or a n other there would be no point in moving her car so my conclusion would be 2 people and one or both of them she knew very well her car was moved so i would say that was moved before leaving work so it implucates 1 colleague as the purse needs placing n the car and of her car was already not where it should have been she would have gone back to the office and said where is the car, unless she usually bought sandwiches somewhere else mg would know where and could say,
or .......she turned right - towards crocodile tears ( 2 doors down ) ...or was the bank that way - cant see any banks on street view - bet they have now all closed - wonder where the bank was in 1986 where she would have maybe used the cashpoint
 
Last edited:
  • #683
One thing i do not know if there is a way to find out if the pow had any allotments they used? The allotments are within 1 mile of stevenage road
At the back of the POW - just wasteland and woodland going down to the railway tracks - look on google maps - satellite view. also DV mentioned this but not sure if this wasteland was ever a line of enquiry
 
  • #684
At the back of the POW - just wasteland and woodland going down to the railway tracks - look on google maps - satellite view. also DV mentioned this but not sure if this wasteland was ever a line of enquiry
One name that seem to have gone under the radar is robert napper , tall lunatic and a gun was found buried that was confirmed linked to him, it would explain the seat and shoddy parking if suzy had been taken under duress and i think the area where the gun was found would be a good point of interest, yes i know he was young but they all start somewhere!
 
Last edited:
  • #685
One name that seem to have gone under the radar is robert napper , tall lunatic and a gun was found buried that was confirmed linked to him, it would explain the seat and shoddy parking if suzy had been taken under duress and i think the area where the gun was found would be a good point of interest, yes i know he wad young but they all start somewhere!
Napper and Kipper mean the same thing really! Someone who likes to sleep...
 
  • #686
Napper and Kipper mean the same thing really! Someone who likes to sleep...
Good spot there, i have not gone deep on this but you just made the hairs stand up on my neck!
 
  • #687
Good spot there, i have not gone deep on this but you just made the hairs stand up on my neck!
I really do think this is the one !
 
  • #688
My final theory on this case (having read books & looked at all the evidence out there and the chaotic first days of the police investigation....... and DL hijacking the inquiry taking to witnesses like WJ before the police did) plus considering information discussed in these threads ..........is as follows - this my opinion !

The police missed so much in the first 24 hours - questions weren't asked that should have been .....

There was no appointment - SJL made that up to leave the office and to attend to a personal matter possibly re the diary or meeting up with someone she knew , this was something she intended to do quickly as she didn't take her handbag ....she did not take keys of details to 37SR as there was no appt ( she made it up so she could have an excuse to leave the office without questions ...otherwise she would have been manning the office ...... evidence of this in DV's investigation / Finding SUZY book) ***The 37 SR appointment - Mr Kipper was written by her in her diary near lunchtime when she realised the big boss was around as he was lunching with MG and had popped into the office before that lunch.She had to nip out and invented a reason.

Who knows what happened next it is unknown- could be something at POW re collecting diary etc

Her car was dumped in Stevenage Rd in a hurry ...not by her...... at some point . it was dumped outside a Sturgis property deliberately so that it thew the investigation ( as I believe Suzy met her demise somewhere different )

* The location of the car in Stevenage Rd is very close to sighting by BW in FPR so that could still be relevant...

* WL is adamant she witnessed the white fiesta correctly- with reg ending in GAN and this fits with where it was found.
After all my posts i have now concluded and will not ever change from the name robert napper
 
  • #689
After all my posts i have now concluded and will not ever change from the name robert napper
I also believe he murdered lorna st theresa hayles prior to this
 
  • #690
After all my posts i have now concluded and will not ever change from the name robert napper
and wimbledon common, brings this even closer, i would think sjl is there somewhere
 
  • #691
and wimbledon common, brings this even closer, i would think sjl is there somewhere
and for anyone i have previously mentioned as a suspect i apologize but that is what got me to this point, thanks tes1984 for the napper-kipper so obvious connection.
 
  • #692
and for anyone i have previously mentioned as a suspect i apologize but that is what got me to this point, thanks tes1984 for the napper-kipper so obvious connection.
in 1986 getting a conditional discharge for being found to carry a loaded gun, probably the one to take control of sjl.and the mouth of the photofit is spot on to a t.
 
Last edited:
  • #693
in 1986 getting a conditional discharge for being found to carry a loaded gun, probably the one to take control of sjl.and the mouth of the photofit is spot on to a t.
Do you think he could have been drinking in the POW in July 1986? Interesting
 
  • #694
Do you think he could have been drinking in the POW in July 1986? Interesting
Who knows but this is the one only 20 at the time though 6’2” may have looked a little older has everything needed to be him so i would say sjl is either on or around wimbledon common or richmond park, he was not fussy and got quite brazen with rachel nickel in broad daylight you cannot argue with the photofit either just look at the mouth.
 
Last edited:
  • #695
Who knows but this is the one, only 20 at the time though 6’2” may have looked a little older has everything needed to be him so i would say sjl is either on or around wimbledon common or richmond park, he was not fussy and got quite brazen with rachel nickel in broad daylight you cannot argue with the photofit either just look at the mouth.
He was known for stalking his prey too so would make sense about the pow
 
  • #696
He was known for stalking his prey too so would make sense about the pow
She wasn't a regular at the Prince of Wales.
 
  • #697
  • #698
Knowing his mo he probably stalked her to that location and to her work
He may have even been the man supposedly looking in the sturgis window.
 
  • #699
He may have even been the man supposedly looking in the sturgis window.
I think they have a partial palm print so just match it to him and we will see there could be a fair chance it is his.
 
  • #700
I think they have a partial palm print so just match it to him and we will see there could be a fair chance it is his.
well the white fiesta is still held as evidence so they could redo forensics on it....
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
116
Guests online
2,662
Total visitors
2,778

Forum statistics

Threads
632,543
Messages
18,628,249
Members
243,192
Latest member
Mcornillie5484
Back
Top