Possibly with JC in mind, by June 1987 the police consider SL ‘dropped’ Kipper at a ‘building to do business’ He ‘invites her in’ things then go wrong. Later he joins friends at a South London pub.
The timeline is off but their ideas are interesting (!)
Was the person @Clairybums flags ever a person of interest?
View attachment 652407
So the Police are suggesting that she was never at 37 Shorrolds Road according to that article by The People? What about the 3 sightings? This is only a year after the fact. Unless it's just a made up theory by the journalist. No Police on the record. Not even a Police source said.Possibly with JC in mind, by June 1987 the police consider SL ‘dropped’ Kipper at a ‘building to do business’ He ‘invites her in’ things then go wrong. Later he joins friends at a South London pub.
The timeline is off but their ideas are interesting (!)
Was the person @Clairybums flags ever a person of interest?
View attachment 652407
37 Shorrolds was considered a possible invention by SL right at the beginning of the investigation by the police (AS).So the Police are suggesting that she was never at 37 Shorrolds Road according to that article by The People? What about the 3 sightings? This is only a year after the fact. Unless it's just a made up theory by the journalist. No Police on the record. Not even a Police source said.
My guess is the car across the road looks like an Austin Maestro but i could well be wrong.From the Newcastle Journal printed on 20th August 1986...
View attachment 652387
A still shot taken from Stevenage Road of the white Fiesta...
View attachment 652390
Is that THE other white car parked across the road?!
Surely not.
For his ‘regular drink’ at lunchtime in a ‘South London’ pub suggests some investigation along these lines (?)So the Police are suggesting that she was never at 37 Shorrolds Road according to that article by The People? What about the 3 sightings? This is only a year after the fact. Unless it's just a made up theory by the journalist. No Police on the record. Not even a Police source said.
IIRC Barley thought in 1986 that she never went to Shorrolds.37 Shorrolds was considered a possible invention by SL right at the beginning of the investigation by the police (AS).
Yes, some of the DV surmises weren’t new. This ‘errand’ has also been problematic, I think, for some on investigation re: timescales. The police appear to think the ‘secret’ diary/contact book was ‘salacious’ (DV) at least in part. Given AN in it & investigated etc there might be supporting evidence here too.IIRC Barley thought in 1986 that she never went to Shorrolds.
DCS carter and the lamplugh squad would have checked this out. they would have looked at every appointment she did since starting at sturgis.Hi this is what I posted and i have put an image of the top entry in her diary on that day for you.
just coming back to the FPR sighting - Wardo avenue runs off FPR - and in her diary on that day was 142 Wardo - bike contract. I cannot see anything that has been investigated into that entry - or any explanation from Sturgis as to rule it out?
View attachment 611529
Just out of curiosity... I'm trying to play catchup so please forgive the randomness/offtopic-ness...Thank You K,
I'm well aware that I've seemingly popped up from nowhere. No one knows me or my father and I've told this story with no corroborating evidence to back it up. I honestly wish I did. The only way I could post to the forum was to sign up. It was something I felt was right to do even if only for my father and in the hope that someone on here (more able that I) might have investigative skills and/or resources. In my mind I hoped that someone, at some point in the future would be able to find out about any possible link to do with WScrubbs, the man and the neighbour (G) from downstairs. The police officer did tell my brother and me that although he did believe it was SL my father had seen that day, the information would not be of use now, so many years later, in finding SL and we accepted that.
At this time I still believe it was JC but mainly because, according to what my brother remembers, when JC was finishing out his time in WScrubbs was around the same time that G was doing 6 months in there. No, I dont have exact dates of their releases or whether they both were at the halfway house before they were freed. I have spoken to my brother more in the last 2 days than in the last year.
I will get hold of the books that have been recommended. It's possible that after reading them, I will change my mind about JC being my prime suspect.
If I do ever get hold of anything that can corroborate, I will be sure to share it.
P.s. sorry for my oversharing in my posts. I am known among my family and friends for this... trying to tell a story, going off on tangents mid way when it sparks another side story then trying to remember where I got to in the main story
very interesting. i wonder why detectives think it was not SL car.From the Newcastle Journal printed on 20th August 1986...
View attachment 652387
A still shot taken from Stevenage Road of the white Fiesta...
View attachment 652390
Is that THE other white car parked across the road?!
Surely not.
i have just got clean. i recently come off heroin, and can tell you its not a recreational drug. it is a opiate. very addictive.
yes, i was thinking the same thing. he would not need to pretend to be a house buyer if he was a business partner of SL, or even pretending to be a B-partner.FWIW I think that the Wardo entry does not mean alot.
I am going through the earlier threads and to quote West Londoner Dec28 2021. Thanks WL.
See below.
The fact that SJL spoke to people about $3k commission (alot of $ in 1986) speaks to some other income source absolutely. WL has posted about this in Thread 2.
It is food for thought. The husband (who is only mentioned once in AS as TSS and I cannot find any reference to online nor PSS ) was apparently involved in property development.
The fact that the wife PSS showed up at ES avenue in a dramatic fashion saying they were going to have lunch on Monday 28th and she felt so bad about not being able to make it - I mean really? (according to AS). Now I think about that it seems a bit suss. but JMO.
According to AS, SJL was at one point supposed to be going into business with a friend and her husband, but she lost interest, perhaps because she envisaged making better money as an estate agent. Money had been spent on the intended venture and SJL then started avoiding this couple. At the same time she reported to her uncle that she being hassled by someone. Just after she disappeared, 8 days after in fact, the husband was declared bankrupt.
My conjecture is that on 28 July, this man is right on the edge and has blown money on something which now can't proceed, thanks to SJL. She's been avoiding him and his wife, so he tricks her into going somewhere he can confront her and demand off her the money she's made him waste.
There is evidence for the venture and someone hassling her. There is evidence from the police that she was remarkably successful at handling money to the point where they even wondered if she might be on the game. The conversation she had with someone on the Saturday, where she said she was expecting a £3,000 "commission", points to some other income stream. If she never went to Shorrolds, as seems likely, then whatever happened must have happened at the only other place she had a need to be headed for.
The BW sighting is challenging to fit into any timeline because it means SJL's car was seen in two places at once: in Stevenage Road and in the Fulham Palace Road, at 2.45. Either one sighting is wrong or both are. If BW is correct I can't think of any other course of events that fits.
The last photo of SJL was taken on Saturday, which was the day she had her hair highlighted. In it she is not especially blonde.
this is what i have always thought. did WJ mistake a white car for SL fiesta, and her car was ditched there later on early evening.Possibly with JC in mind, by June 1987 the police consider SL ‘dropped’ Kipper at a ‘building to do business’ He ‘invites her in’ things then go wrong. Later he joins friends at a South London pub.
The timeline is off but their ideas are interesting (!)
Was the person @Clairybums flags ever a person of interest?
View attachment 652407
i believe she went to 37SR, and i dont think she was killed so quickly like implied in this article/theory.So the Police are suggesting that she was never at 37 Shorrolds Road according to that article by The People? What about the 3 sightings? This is only a year after the fact. Unless it's just a made up theory by the journalist. No Police on the record. Not even a Police source said.
thanks.Off topic but I must say this is an extraordinary achievement. I can't begin to imagine how hard that was and I wish you every luck in the future.
thanks.
I think she went to 37 as well. The first sighting outside of the lady standing right at the entrance looking as if she was waiting for someone. If that's not Suzy then whom? Another estate agent? Someone waiting for a mini cab? One sighting you could explain away. But 3?i believe she went to 37SR, and i dont think she was killed so quickly like implied in this article/theory.
thanks. the lamplugh case is an obsession of mine, but a healthy obsession, ha, ha.Trying to solve cold cases is a healthier addiction, and I think you have a lot of potential to do something within the UK true crime industry in the future.