I recall PR being spoken to about the fact that there were no other size 12s found in the home, but don't recall that it was said that LE found a size 6 that said "Wednesday". For that matter, while LE mentions removing size 4-6 panties, LE never mentions specifically that ANY other panties that were "Bloomies Day of the Week" panties were found an all, except for the pair on the body.
As far as JBR wearing day clothes- not exactly. While she was wearing a cotton sweatshirt top, the long johns were not day clothes. And as I have mentioned- every mother has once in a while put a child to bed wearing the shirt they had worn that day, especially when a child has fallen asleep elsewhere (on a couch, in a car, etc.) You can pull off the pants and pull on pajama bottoms (or thermal undies) without waking the child; pulling a shirt over the head and manipulating their arms to change out of the shirt into pajama tops is more difficult to do without waking the child.
The fact that JBR was wearing a shirt worn that day with long johns may have no bearing on the crime. It's the replacement panties that have a bearing on the crime.
However- I have not seen where there was any mention of the pink pajama tops and bottoms JBR wore Christmas Eve (and seen in the Christmas morning photos) . There is something on her bed that seems to be at least one half of the pink pajamas. If it was the top, then where are the bottoms? They may be a BIG link to the crime- if stained with blood or other matter. So where are they? I don't recall seeing them on any evidence list. I wonder if they went out the door with Auntie P?
Now, the disappearance of the pink pajama bottoms would make me suspicious of the long johns. Then I'd have reason to think that the long johns were put on her after whatever caused the vaginal bleeding. THEN it makes sense. Blood on the panties- blood on the pink pajama bottoms- blood on her pubic area and thighs. Wipe the blood, change the panties, change the pink pajama bottoms. To make it look like she was abducted from bed, she'd have to be wearing appropriate clothes.
DeeDee249,
I recall PR being spoken to about the fact that there were no other size 12s found in the home, but don't recall that it was said that LE found a size 6 that said "Wednesday". For that matter, while LE mentions removing size 4-6 panties, LE never mentions specifically that ANY other panties that were "Bloomies Day of the Week" panties were found an all, except for the pair on the body.
Exactly, but Patsy was specifically asked to verify that she had purchased a set of size-6 Bloomingdales for JonBenet, she could not remember. So either a size-6 Wednesday pair of Bloomingdales is missing from a set recovered from her drawer or they are present? There is not much point in asking Patsy about the Bloomingdales size-6's if
none were recovered, e.g. the intruder stole them all!
The size-6's were a line of questioning that had been intended to be developed, but Patsy knew where that was going so forgot if she purchased them, so its likely that the police knew there was a
missing pair of size-6's and wanted Patsy to confirm they had been part of the Bloomingdales purchase. Contrast this with Patsy's vividly instant recall that she did indeed purchase the size-12's, and placed them into JonBenet's panty drawer, yet these were
missing no others to be found in the house. Something does not add up here?
If there are
no missing pairs of Bloomingdales size-6's then this too might need to be verified, from memory 15 pairs of size-6's were recovered from JonBenet's panty drawer. So that is potentially two sets of day's of the week, or one named set and the rest various? Assuming Patsy did no washing on the Monday, Tuesday, there might be worn pairs of Bloomingdales size-6's corresponding to the latter days of the week, but a clean Wednesday pair. I reckon without the soiled Monday, Tuesday pairs the Wednesday day of the week logic is weakened?
So from 15 choices of underwear none are Wednesday day of the week, so why not select
any pair of size-6's, since if you are going to maintain JonBenet dressed herself in the size-12's, why not
any other pair of pants, this would explain why they are not Wednesday day of the week? Which brings us full circle to the probability that there is a Bloomingdale Wednesday pair of size-6's missing, something Patsy could not confirm since she
forgot if she ever purchased them.
For that matter, while LE mentions removing size 4-6 panties, LE never mentions specifically that ANY other panties that were "Bloomies Day of the Week" panties were found an all, except for the pair on the body.
I agree, but we know that no other size-12's were recovered from JonBenet's panty drawer, so if
no other Bloomingdales pants were in the drawer, then why the persistent questioning regarding Patsy purchasing a set of size-6's for JonBenet? That is Patsy states that she purchased a set of pants
selected by JonBenet and a set for her niece Jenny, both were days of the week, what was not clarified was the respective sizes. What has Patsy to gain from forgetting about the Bloomingdales size-6's, not much if they are lying in JonBenet's panty drawer, but a lot more if a pair can be confirmed as missing or not, since it will confirm or deny any conjecture regarding the rationale for the size-12 redressing?
The fact that JBR was wearing a shirt worn that day with long johns may have no bearing on the crime. It's the replacement panties that have a bearing on the crime.
It does have a bearing on the staged crime-scene though, since it is inconsistent with a staged bedtime abduction, since redressing JonBenet in bedclothes is no more difficult than longjohns and size-12's and removes the need for a sleeping JonBenet being carried into the house?
However- I have not seen where there was any mention of the pink pajama tops and bottoms JBR wore Christmas Eve (and seen in the Christmas morning photos) . There is something on her bed that seems to be at least one half of the pink pajamas. If it was the top, then where are the bottoms? They may be a BIG link to the crime- if stained with blood or other matter. So where are they? I don't recall seeing them on any evidence list. I wonder if they went out the door with Auntie P?
I agree, Pamela Paugh may have removed these along with anything else, but just why they were not left on a bloodied JonBenet as evidence of an intruder assault is curious?
.