Watching this video carefully of the sidebar that occured just after the above noted marker and it appears to me that it is only about the SA using one of their P-strikes against this morning's PJ.
LB is the one doing all the talking, she has her reading glasses on and all parties are focused on and listening to her not the judge. Then JB goes back and gets some papers off his table and is face to face with LB discussing intensely, neither appears to turn to the HHJP at all until the end. Then HHJP goes back to the bench and announced the SA's p-strike.
Could the striking of this juror make the DT team want to appeal on some grounds?
Not sure either why this was done as a sidebar versus open court.
Perhaps it had everything to do with the pj speaking privately to the attys and judge, so the strike could not addressed in open court either.