Unfortuntately we have a lot of opinion being presented as fact on this thread, and a lot of fact being dismissed as "lies".
What may have been normal procedure 30 years ago is no longer acceptable.
Apart from anything else, the living must be protected from the dead - putrification can be acidic and quite toxic and can cause damage if splashed on uncovered skin...quite apart from the smell.
Unless and until we have a verified expert posting on details like this in the UK, the opinions of a layman can be largely disregarded.
I am talking about the present. All that is required in antomy labs, even in the preservation rooms, are lab coats and soemtimes gloves. People are not going to become ill from a normal dead body.
During an autopsy more covering is required, but still not up to clean room levels for instance. But in normal anatomy rooms a lab coat is fine, nothing forensic is going on so it does not matter if an eyelash gets dropped for instance because there is no forensic examination. Do people think that autopsies are the only time people come into contact with dead bodies, what about all the students doing medicine, dentistry, anatomy, people working in care homes, hospices, hospitals, those in the home sof people who die at home, paramedics. Do people honestly think that when someone dies in hospital everyone rushes to put on masks and gloves? Of course not everyone stays in the same clothes, doctors just wear their white coats, nurses their uniforms and other people there stay in their normal clothes. Nurses might leave their uniforms at work, but do you think they do not come into contact with others in the hospital, go to the canteen etc and transfer any scent. Its like the belongings of someone who has died at home, there is not a plague style burning of the things in the house. They are normally kept by relatives, sold, given to charities etc. Very few places will not have either had someone die in them, or objects that have been in the home of someone who died.
clutchbag
I have never said grie said eddie alerts to odour sapart from blood. I said Grime and ahhrison have stated the following
mark harrison states (
http://www.mccannfiles.com/id293.html) that the evrd will locate very small samples of human remains, bodily fluids, and bood.
Martin grimes states "'eddie' the enhanced victim recovery dog (e.v.r.d.) will search for and locate human remains and body fluids including blood in any environment or terrain."
http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/pj/martin_grimes.htm
that is eddie will locate bodily fluid sincluding blood.
And as for the claim "otherwise he woudl not be called a cadaver dog", well he is not called a cadaver dog apart from in media headlines (often the red tops). neither eddie or grime refer to eddie as a cadaver dog.