BritsKate
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 14, 2010
- Messages
- 6,234
- Reaction score
- 4,835
BBMWell that is what happened n jersey accoring to a report, they just dug where the dog barked and then it turne dout the dog may have alerted to bodly fluids on tissues (it was an area used by couples - nice). I have wondered when grimes has said that the dogs are so ncredibly accurate that they react to even tiny and hstorc scent if that coudl cause problems, and it appears it does.
I also wonder how many alerts I may have cause din the past. I have spent a lot of time in morturies or anatomy labs and contrary to what some peole think I have never worn much protective gear, no-one really did normally. Sometimes if I could be bothered I wore a basic lab coat, but I also wore this when I would go to the canteen, carry it in my bag on the bus etc and it certianly did not cover all of my clothing. I would have transferred the scent everywhere I went, and onto everything and everyone I came into contact with. Its not something I ever thought about to be honest. But if dogs alert to historic scent, then they woudl alert to wherever I have been!
I find that shocking and a bit scary to be honest considering that is against recommended health and safety protocol and regulations widely available online both for mortuaries as well as universities. I certainly could never, would never, do that type of work without protective gear. MOO
Sorry for the off topic, guys! :seeya: