I feel like he is intentionally trying to make things harder for the witnesses by interrupting and asking unnecessary questions. Like making the cop explain what it means that he's "pretty good with cars." He is obviously intelligent enough to find semi-related caselaw and sometimes put together decent sounding legal arguments. The judge has directed him to the hearsay statute multiple times and even explained the meaning to him. Yet, he is still objecting on questions where they are asking for the witnesses recollection of an event, or even their own opinion. It is frustrating to watch.