IN - Abigail Williams, 13, & Liberty German, 14, Delphi, 13 Feb 2017 #65

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Status
Not open for further replies.
what evidence is there of a meth lab? police are trained to find meth labs, you can smell them and they leave scars where ever they are, there is no known evidence that the girls stumbled on to a meth lab. I think we should rule it out as there is nothing to suggest it. MOO

Agreed, no evidence thus far of any meth production activity in the immediate vicinity of the bridge.

It's a public area. If there were issues of that sort, we'd know by now.
 
The police video today was very interesting, but not too encouraging about DNA. After being asked if they have DNA, he immedialey mentioned the girls DNA, the relatives DNA, and something to the effect of sorting out DNA. Woulda been nice to have heard a definite yes to possible DNA of THE PERP.

maybe they want him to think they don't have it..so he won't run...false sense of security might embolden him though, like maybe start talking about the crime a lot , saying they don't have DNA etc... I hope they are really scouring the little town hide out taverns, talking to bartenders etc.

they should have someone calling all the bars. They should stop in, show around the sketch.... I just know he has a regular bar or two.
 
Agreed, no evidence thus far of any meth production activity in the immediate vicinity of the bridge.

It's a public area. If there were issues of that sort, we'd know by now.

Meth production is quite involved and potentially very volatile, not to mention all the toxic refuse involved. And there is the stink. That is a pretty wild theory.
 
See first transcribed interview at post # 186 (Parts 1, 2) http://www.websleuths.com/forums/sh...Delphi-13-Feb-2017-65&p=13565009#post13565009

27-minute video interview 8/14/2017, Det. Holeman, near bottom of page, two sources (I acutally used the second):
http://fox59.com/2017/08/14/lead-de...ave-more-audio-from-teens-phone-dna-evidence/
https://player.ooyala.com/static/v4...5267225247&pcode=A5YjUyOju0deP9y9BK28b-61JYT5
Continuing from [13.13]
A= Alexis McAdams H=Det. Holeman
====

Part 3 starts at 13.13
A: That area where the bodies were found, too, when you guys went down there, because you guys kept that crime tape up for awhile, you were still going back down there and re-tracing the steps and looking for anything, that, you know, you might have needed to go back, you know, to the scene to check out.... so when you went back down there, so that area that was taped off, that area was where bodies were found, right in that circular, that taped off place?

H: Yes.

A: So that's where when we walked down there, obviously all that investigative work had been done and they had taken away any evidence they had found. Was there a decent amount of evidence found at the scene?

H: Oh, I think so. I think, uh, you know, without getting into detail, I think, like I said, we don't have a lot of evidence, but we do have more than, you know, maybe your normal crime scene. We have evidence there that we're processing daily and working on, and still, yeah it's been six months but there is still different techniques you can use and things like that. I'm not a lab person, so I can't talk in lab language, but I'm in contact with them weekly, if not daily, and they are telling us we're still doing this, we're still working on things. Yeah, it's hard to say without jeopardizing the integrity of rthe invesrtigation how much evidence we had, because there's three people, in my opinion, maybe more, but at least three people that know what happened, knew what happened that day, and two of them are dead. So that one person knows the details of the crime. That's why we don't like to talk about the details or what we found or what we didn't find, because when we do get that person, when we do talk to them, they are the only ones that are gonna know the details for this. And that's another reason why we don't like FB putting false information out because then people believe that and then they tip off of those details that are false, and it just kind of impedes our investigartion a little bit.

A: [15.11] Was there DNA evidence found at the scene.

H: Well, yeah. Obviously that's a tricky question nobody wants to answer. You know, I think in every crime scene you have, you're gonna have DNA. You're gonna have the victim's DNA, you're gonna probably have victim's family's DNA. You know touch DNA is very powerful, so if I touch your shirt today, you know that DNA could still be there for weeks, if not months. So we're still working on identifying whose all DNA we have there, and we will continue to do that until we determine who all's DNA is at the scene.

A: so, this guy, you know, thinks he possibly got away with this, and that's one of the things, too, I know you guys are waiting, possibly he could start talking about it to people, because that's happened in other cases, they think 'ope, I got away with it' and then they go start trying brag about it, which is something you guys are following up on every day. But if he thinks he got away with it and thinks he cleaned up the scene, there still could possibly be something that he left behind?

H: Absolutely. so, yeah.

A: That's powerful, though, for the community to know too, because they were like that's, like I know you mentioned that's the question that nobody really wanted to get too much into when we talked to the Sheriff and things, but you mentioned any DNA, and DNA's from the girls, DNA is at the scene just from other things. But that's important that you guys are running that through and working with the lab. um, and then, is there anything that happened within that first 48 hours when you stepped in, too. Like, you volunteered immediately to have Indiana State Police come in to help out the Sheriff's department. Is there anything you think that could have been done differently that could have put the case in jeopardy in the beginning stages?

H: Absolutely. I think, you know, when you Monday morning quarterback, there are things you could have possibly done a little better or quicker now. Is there anything we did or didn't do that jeopardized this case? No. I think that with the FBI and the County and the State, all the resources that we have used, there's really nothing that we could have done more. But, I'm my own worst critic, so is there anything we couuld have done better? Yeah. That's every case. But we continue to learn from that and again, like I said, we didn't do anything or not do anything to jeopardize the case, but are ther things that we could do better? Yeah. So, you know, with have Jay Harper with the State Police Investigator, we have Tim McKindle, also, with the State Police Lead Investigator, and my job is to kind of manage this, so I have been trying to manage this from Day One, with the County, with the FBI, so that's an obstacle in itself, trying to manage something this big, but we've had plenty of guidance from all of our supervisors and such a great team; I mean, we obviously have gotten along with Carroll County pretty well and unfortunately, through other instances happen because life doesn't stop, so, unfortunately, we still get major crime scenes that they have to assist with here. And manpower issues, I mean we all have them. The county is short-handed, the State Police are short-handed, the FBI, everybody needs more. So if you are out there, apply for the State Police next time, we definitely need the help.

A: [18.33] you need help, yeah, get some new recruits. Umm, tell me, with the audio, which we heard. I remember the first time that was played at the press conference and that was bone-chilling to know you are going to be able to hear this person's voice, even though it was just that tiny clip. But what he was saying gave away, you know, some clues as well, but what has that been able to do for the case, having that voice out there?

H: I think it's helped a lot. Obviously, it's a distinctive voice. We've been getting a lot of tips off of that. unfortunately, the people that people think it is, we've been able to eliminate them. Not all of them, but most of them, we can eliminate through checking records and things like that. So, I think it's helped quite a bit. I think as we get into this deeper, it's gonna help us even more-so.

A: Is there more audio that was found on Libby's phone?

H: Yes.

A: Is that something that would be released?

H: Not at this point. We've discussed it and at this point we don't think it will help the investigation. At this time it doesn't appear to be anything more than some discussion between the girls and things like that. So, we've only released a portion of it. There's some others that we think could help us, but again, protecting the integrity of the investigation is the key here. We can't release everything we have, because there's only certain people that know the details. If we release everything then we get into possible false confessions and people over-exaggerating and embellishing things put on FB like we already battle with. So, we can only give so much.

A: The FB thing, I know that's been a, that's had a huge effect on the family. I mean, that's like, you know, probably a few years ago if this case had happened, or a decade ago, that wouldn't even have been a thing. Has that interfered with the case?

H: Oh absolutely. I talked to some of the older investigators, they didn't have to deal with that. When I talk about some of the stresses about social media. I've had a tip on me from interviewing with other stations. Absolutely. We've had tips on other police officers for whatever reason. We've had people that do their blogs that put out false information, and then if I tell them that's false and then they embellish and tell people that I'm giving out details of the case, which we are not. I will try to squash any rumors that people call and ask about, without jeopardizing the integrity of the investigation. But yeah, you know, again, I can't imagine what the family is going through just because of the incident, but now you have social media with all these rumors and false implications that i'ts just got to be driving them crazy. I talk tot the family quite a bit and try to tell them, you know, don't believe everything you hear on social media. I think it could be positive, I think. But what I would say is, instead of posting it on FB, call us before and let us investigate it because once you put it out there and it is false, then it interferes with our investigation and it bogs us down, because people start tipping off of false information, and we follow up on every tip. So, I think social media is a challenge for us, and we're trying to utilize it to teh best of our abilities, but it is definitely something that interferes with our investigations at times.
A: [22.04] How often do you listen to the audio clip. I mean, you probably listen to the full one, but is that something that kind of gives you .... when you're feeling down or you're like 'all right, here I am six months later and we have all these people working the case, you put, like, your whole life has been pretty much been consumed by this, so I mean, when you try to listen to that guy's voice again and look at that picture, does that kind of give you more momentum to be like, 'I'm gonna find you."?

H: I think that every time I close my eyes I hear the audio and I see the picture, I don't have to listen to it because I have listened to it a million times. But yeah, it definitely re-motivates us to think about that. So yeah, it's there

A: Do you think he thinKs he got away with it"

H: Oh yeah. I think probably. But he didn't. We'll catch him. I mean, like I said, it's not from lack of effort and we will continue to put all the effort that we have available and utilize all the resources that we have until we catch the monster that's responsible for this.

A: This is something that I wanted to ask about the audio clip. You mentioned that there's discussions and things like that. Can you say if the recording was going when thE murder happened?

H: I would say that I can't divulge that, just to protect the integrity of the investigation.

A: Resources you said you had never seen so many resources, FBI, ATF, local, State, Federal authorities, all coming in. I mean, you had all those people coming from Quantico and tried to help with the behavioral analysis, and that was also interesting in the beginning. Did that help, did that bring you guys maybe to a stage where you think you kind of know more about his guy?

H: Well, I think so. You know, the FBI has brought their behavioral analysis unit, they gave us more information. You know. We utilized social media, people just looking at social media. Like I said, it's bad, but we can also gather a lot of information about people from the social media, or digital media recovery specialist that, you know, would get all the information off of computers for us, and cell phones and, yeah. It's just a ton of resources that we were able to utilize through State, Local, and Federal.

A: [24.16] Was her cell phone, I mean, are you surprised he didn't try to take cell phone or take any evidence with him?

H: Was I surprised that ....?

A: That he didn't try to take it? I mean, you would think that if that had had, maybe he didn't know that they were recording, but ...

H: Yeah.

A: Do you believe that?

H: You know, I don't know. Nothing surprises me any more after doing this job for awhile, but who knows what he was thinking or what he knew. You know, we don't know that.

A: But it was all pretty, like, you didn't have to go searching through the woods, all that stuff was kind of let in that area, right?

H: ahh, that's a fair statement, the general area.

A: Then, going to tips, you've had thousands of tips, thousands of dollars in reward money. How many people have you guys interviewed?

H: Well, I would say probably thousands of people. Depends on what you consider an interview. A lot of people may say that's a little smaller, but we did an area canvass, so we interviewed probably 600 people that were driving through the area, we'd stop, talk to them. We've contacted numerous people to talk to them and I would consider those interviews. As far as formal, you know, if you're audio/videoing somebody, is that a formal interview? Probably four or five hundred-ish. But we have talked to thousands of people on this case.

A: The last thing. Do you think that he was from Delphi?

H: You know, I really don't know. I think for obvious reasons I think he had to know the area. Was he from here, visiting, or been here.... I mean, I don't know. But you mentioned earlier the train and that area taht this incident occurred, for somebody just to go out there and be able to do what he did and leave, you would think he either got real lucky and walked the right way to get out with nobody seeing him, or drove or flew, who knows how he left the scene, or he knew the area.

A: Was a weapon left at the scene?

H: uhh, I don't want to answer that at this time, so....

A: Anything else you want to add, or is that pretty much everything?

H: Oh, I think so. I think that's it

[a man out of the scene is asking a question] For the image to be captured on the phone, was there prior video of the girls together before that, or do you think they felt danger from this person and that is why she recorded that clip of him?

H: Both. There were pictures of ... they went out there to take pictures on the bridge, and there was pictures and video, but it appeared that, and this has been said before, that Liberty had enough senses to realize that something wasn't right and she started that video because she felt uncomfortable, both girls were uncomfortable. And I think that's why. But they were out there taking pictures with the phone and videos.

A: Is the clip like several minutes long?

H: I don't know exactly how long it is, but .... (He seems "uncomfortable", for lack of a better description)

A: Did she shut it off, or was it just ....

H: uh, I don't want to talk about how that ... right now.

A: OK, that's fine. sorry

[that's the end]
 
See first transcribed interview at post # 186 (Parts 1, 2) http://www.websleuths.com/forums/member.php?99051-Spellbound

27-minute video interview 8/14/2017, Det. Holeman, near bottom of page, two sources (I acutally used the second):
http://fox59.com/2017/08/14/lead-de...ave-more-audio-from-teens-phone-dna-evidence/
https://player.ooyala.com/static/v4...5267225247&pcode=A5YjUyOju0deP9y9BK28b-61JYT5
Continuing from [13.13]
A= Alexis McAdams H=Det. Holeman
====

Part 3 starts at 13.13
A: That area where the bodies were found, too, when you guys went down there, because you guys kept that crime tape up for awhile, you were still going back down there and re-tracing the steps and looking for anything, that, you know, you might have needed to go back, you know, to the scene to check out.... so when you went back down there, so that area that was taped off, that area was where bodies were found, right in that circular, that taped off place?

H: Yes.

A: So that's where when we walked down there, obviously all that investigative work had been done and they had taken away any evidence they had found. Was there a decent amount of evidence found at the scene?

H: Oh, I think so. I think, uh, you know, without getting into detail, I think, like I said, we don't have a lot of evidence, but we do have more than, you know, maybe your normal crime scene. We have evidence there that we're processing daily and working on, and still, yeah it's been six months but there is still different techniques you can use and things like that. I'm not a lab person, so I can't talk in lab language, but I'm in contact with them weekly, if not daily, and they are telling us we're still doing this, we're still working on things. Yeah, it's hard to say without jeopardizing the integrity of rthe invesrtigation how much evidence we had, because there's three people, in my opinion, maybe more, but at least three people that know what happened, knew what happened that day, and two of them are dead. So that one person knows the details of the crime. That's why we don't like to talk about the details or what we found or what we didn't find, because when we do get that person, when we do talk to them, they are the only ones that are gonna know the details for this. And that's another reason why we don't like FB putting false information out because then people believe that and then they tip off of those details that are false, and it just kind of impedes our investigartion a little bit.

A: [15.11] Was there DNA evidence found at the scene.

H: Well, yeah. Obviously that's a tricky question nobody wants to answer. You know, I think in every crime scene you have, you're gonna have DNA. You're gonna have the victim's DNA, you're gonna probably have victim's family's DNA. You know touch DNA is very powerful, so if I touch your shirt today, you know that DNA could still be there for weeks, if not months. So we're still working on identifying whose all DNA we have there, and we will continue to do that until we determine who all's DNA is at the scene.

A: so, this guy, you know, thinks he possibly got away with this, and that's one of the things, too, I know you guys are waiting, possibly he could start talking about it to people, because that's happened in other cases, they think 'ope, I got away with it' and then they go start trying brag about it, which is something you guys are following up on every day. But if he thinks he got away with it and thinks he cleaned up the scene, there still could possibly be something that he left behind?

H: Absolutely. so, yeah.

A: That's powerful, though, for the community to know too, because they were like that's, like I know you mentioned that's the question that nobody really wanted to get too much into when we talked to the Sheriff and things, but you mentioned any DNA, and DNA's from the girls, DNA is at the scene just from other things. But that's important that you guys are running that through and working with the lab. um, and then, is there anything that happened within that first 48 hours when you stepped in, too. Like, you volunteered immediately to have Indiana State Police come in to help out the Sheriff's department. Is there anything you think that could have been done differently that could have put the case in jeopardy in the beginning stages?

H: Absolutely. I think, you know, when you Monday morning quarterback, there are things you could have possibly done a little better or quicker now. Is there anything we did or didn't do that jeopardized this case? No. I think that with the FBI and the County and the State, all the resources that we have used, there's really nothing that we could have done more. But, I'm my own worst critic, so is there anything we couuld have done better? Yeah. That's every case. But we continue to learn from that and again, like I said, we didn't do anything or not do anything to jeopardize the case, but are ther things that we could do better? Yeah. So, you know, with have Jay Harper with the State Police Investigator, we have Tim McKindle, also, with the State Police Lead Investigator, and my job is to kind of manage this, so I have been trying to manage this from Day One, with the County, with the FBI, so that's an obstacle in itself, trying to manage something this big, but we've had plenty of guidance from all of our supervisors and such a great team; I mean, we obviously have gotten along with Carroll County pretty well and unfortunately, through other instances happen because life doesn't stop, so, unfortunately, we still get major crime scenes that they have to assist with here. And manpower issues, I mean we all have them. The county is short-handed, the State Police are short-handed, the FBI, everybody needs more. So if you are out there, apply for the State Police next time, we definitely need the help.

A: [18.33] you need help, yeah, get some new recruits. Umm, tell me, with the audio, which we heard. I remember the first time that was played at the press conference and that was bone-chilling to know you are going to be able to hear this person's voice, even though it was just that tiny clip. But what he was saying gave away, you know, some clues as well, but what has that been able to do for the case, having that voice out there?

H: I think it's helped a lot. Obviously, it's a distinctive voice. We've been getting a lot of tips off of that. unfortunately, the people that people think it is, we've been able to eliminate them. Not all of them, but most of them, we can eliminate through checking records and things like that. So, I think it's helped quite a bit. I think as we get into this deeper, it's gonna help us even more-so.

A: Is there more audio that was found on Libby's phone?

H: Yes.

A: Is that something that would be released?

H: Not at this point. We've discussed it and at this point we don't think it will help the investigation. At this time it doesn't appear to be anything more than some discussion between the girls and things like that. So, we've only released a portion of it. There's some others that we think could help us, but again, protecting the integrity of the investigation is the key here. We can't release everything we have, because there's only certain people that know the details. If we release everything then we get into possible false confessions and people over-exaggerating and embellishing things put on FB like we already battle with. So, we can only give so much.

A: The FB thing, I know that's been a, that's had a huge effect on the family. I mean, that's like, you know, probably a few years ago if this case had happened, or a decade ago, that wouldn't even have been a thing. Has that interfered with the case?

H: Oh absolutely. I talked to some of the older investigators, they didn't have to deal with that. When I talk about some of the stresses about social media. I've had a tip on me from interviewing with other stations. Absolutely. We've had tips on other police officers for whatever reason. We've had people that do their blogs that put out false information, and then if I tell them that's false and then they embellish and tell people that I'm giving out details of the case, which we are not. I will try to squash any rumors that people call and ask about, without jeopardizing the integrity of the investigation. But yeah, you know, again, I can't imagine what the family is going through just because of the incident, but now you have social media with all these rumors and false implications that i'ts just got to be driving them crazy. I talk tot the family quite a bit and try to tell them, you know, don't believe everything you hear on social media. I think it could be positive, I think. But what I would say is, instead of posting it on FB, call us before and let us investigate it because once you put it out there and it is false, then it interferes with our investigation and it bogs us down, because people start tipping off of false information, and we follow up on every tip. So, I think social media is a challenge for us, and we're trying to utilize it to teh best of our abilities, but it is definitely something that interferes with our investigations at times.
A: [22.04] How often do you listen to the audio clip. I mean, you probably listen to the full one, but is that something that kind of gives you .... when you're feeling down or you're like 'all right, here I am six months later and we have all these people working the case, you put, like, your whole life has been pretty much been consumed by this, so I mean, when you try to listen to that guy's voice again and look at that picture, does that kind of give you more momentum to be like, 'I'm gonna find you."?

H: I think that every time I close my eyes I hear the audio and I see the picture, I don't have to listen to it because I have listened to it a million times. But yeah, it definitely re-motivates us to think about that. So yeah, it's there

A: Do you think he thinKs he got away with it"

H: Oh yeah. I think probably. But he didn't. We'll catch him. I mean, like I said, it's not from lack of effort and we will continue to put all the effort that we have available and utilize all the resources that we have until we catch the monster that's responsible for this.

A: This is something that I wanted to ask about the audio clip. You mentioned that there's discussions and things like that. Can you say if the recording was going when thE murder happened?

H: I would say that I can't divulge that, just to protect the integrity of the investigation.

A: Resources you said you had never seen so many resources, FBI, ATF, local, State, Federal authorities, all coming in. I mean, you had all those people coming from Quantico and tried to help with the behavioral analysis, and that was also interesting in the beginning. Did that help, did that bring you guys maybe to a stage where you think you kind of know more about his guy?

H: Well, I think so. You know, the FBI has brought their behavioral analysis unit, they gave us more information. You know. We utilized social media, people just looking at social media. Like I said, it's bad, but we can also gather a lot of information about people from the social media, or digital media recovery specialist that, you know, would get all the information off of computers for us, and cell phones and, yeah. It's just a ton of resources that we were able to utilize through State, Local, and Federal.

A: [24.16] Was her cell phone, I mean, are you surprised he didn't try to take cell phone or take any evidence with him?

H: Was I surprised that ....?

A: That he didn't try to take it? I mean, you would think that if that had had, maybe he didn't know that they were recording, but ...

H: Yeah.

A: Do you believe that?

H: You know, I don't know. Nothing surprises me any more after doing this job for awhile, but who knows what he was thinking or what he knew. You know, we don't know that.

A: But it was all pretty, like, you didn't have to go searching through the woods, all that stuff was kind of let in that area, right?

H: ahh, that's a fair statement, the general area.

A: Then, going to tips, you've had thousands of tips, thousands of dollars in reward money. How many people have you guys interviewed?

H: Well, I would say probably thousands of people. Depends on what you consider an interview. A lot of people may say that's a little smaller, but we did an area canvass, so we interviewed probably 600 people that were driving through the area, we'd stop, talk to them. We've contacted numerous people to talk to them and I would consider those interviews. As far as formal, you know, if you're audio/videoing somebody, is that a formal interview? Probably four or five hundred-ish. But we have talked to thousands of people on this case.

A: The last thing. Do you think that he was from Delphi?

H: You know, I really don't know. I think for obvious reasons I think he had to know the area. Was he from here, visiting, or been here.... I mean, I don't know. But you mentioned earlier the train and that area taht this incident occurred, for somebody just to go out there and be able to do what he did and leave, you would think he either got real lucky and walked the right way to get out with nobody seeing him, or drove or flew, who knows how he left the scene, or he knew the area.

A: Was a weapon left at the scene?

H: uhh, I don't want to answer that at this time, so....

A: Anything else you want to add, or is that pretty much everything?

H: Oh, I think so. I think that's it

[a man out of the scene is asking a question] For the image to be captured on the phone, was there prior video of the girls together before that, or do you think they felt danger from this person and that is why she recorded that clip of him?

H: Both. There were pictures of ... they went out there to take pictures on the bridge, and there was pictures and video, but it appeared that, and this has been said before, that Liberty had enough senses to realize that something wasn't right and she started that video because she felt uncomfortable, both girls were uncomfortable. And I think that's why. But they were out there taking pictures with the phone and videos.

A: Is the clip like several minutes long?

H: I don't know exactly how long it is, but .... (He seems "uncomfortable", for lack of a better description)

A: Did she shut it off, or was it just ....

H: uh, I don't want to talk about how that ... right now.

A: OK, that's fine. sorry

[that's the end]

"A: [15.11] Was there DNA evidence found at the scene.

H: Well, yeah. Obviously that's a tricky question nobody wants to answer. You know, I think in every crime scene you have, you're gonna have DNA. You're gonna have the victim's DNA, you're gonna probably have victim's family's DNA. You know touch DNA is very powerful, so if I touch your shirt today, you know that DNA could still be there for weeks, if not months. So we're still working on identifying whose all DNA we have there, and we will continue to do that until we determine who all's DNA is at the scene.


This is the quote that I was referring to. Do you see how he references how long touch DNA can last, etc....? LE has a ton of DNA to comb through--because the girls may have lots of touch and transference DNA on clothing and skin.

If LE had a suspect, it would be easy. They could simply include or exclude the suspect's DNA from the lot. But they have no suspect DNA, so all they can do is try and exclude DNA, until they narrow the profiles down to DNA they can't identify--and if there are a lot of profiles and persons to test against for exclusion, that's an involved process. And if the DNA that they can't identify doesn't match any profile in CODIS, then they have to wait until they can match the profiles.

I'm in complete awe of investigators on this case. Their job is immense.
 
The police video today was very interesting, but not too encouraging about DNA. After being asked if they have DNA, he immedialey mentioned the girls DNA, the relatives DNA, and something to the effect of sorting out DNA. Woulda been nice to have heard a definite yes to possible DNA of THE PERP.

maybe they want him to think they don't have it..so he won't run...false sense of security might embolden him though, like maybe start talking about the crime a lot , saying they don't have DNA etc... I hope they are really scouring the little town hide out taverns, talking to bartenders etc.

they should have someone calling all the bars. They should stop in, show around the sketch.... I just know he has a regular bar or two.
 
The FBI told the public what to look out for. They should have included wet shoes and wet pants.
 
Gray Hughes says his Flow video 3 was so accurate that LE contacted him and was impressed at how he was able to come up with the flow of the crime with just publicly available info. http://youtube.com/watch?v=cTvPXfFltSo If this new one has been linked....scroll and roll
 
Meth production is quite involved and potentially very volatile, not to mention all the toxic refuse involved. And there is the stink. That is a pretty wild theory.

Meth is pretty much my county's #1 export. I have stumbled upon quite a few portable meth labs in the woods, but they've always been on private property, way off the beaten path. Cooking meth is fairly involved and takes quite awhile. While I have no doubt that drugs are bought and sold in that particular area (just in a general sense, considering that where I live you can buy whatever you want anywhere from the McDonalds' parking lot to Main Street) I also find it highly unlikely that there was a meth lab in the park. We are talking a very short timeframe in regards to the girls' murders. They had just enough time to leave the vehicle and walk to the bridge to take pictures. No real time to get off the beaten path and do any real exploring. As you said, with the smell and such, people try to be fairly discreet. They're not going to be on the main trail cooking it up. I don't think they even stumbled upon a drug deal. I have come across drug deals. We all just turn the other way and continue moving, pretending we didn't see what we saw-the dealers included. Sad, but the current reality in many small towns these days.
 
Meth is pretty much my county's #1 export. I have stumbled upon quite a few portable meth labs in the woods, but they've always been on private property, way off the beaten path. Cooking meth is fairly involved and takes quite awhile. While I have no doubt that drugs are bought and sold in that particular area (just in a general sense, considering that where I live you can buy whatever you want anywhere from the McDonalds' parking lot to Main Street) I also find it highly unlikely that there was a meth lab in the park. We are talking a very short timeframe in regards to the girls' murders. They had just enough time to leave the vehicle and walk to the bridge to take pictures. No real time to get off the beaten path and do any real exploring. As you said, with the smell and such, people try to be fairly discreet. They're not going to be on the main trail cooking it up. I don't think they even stumbled upon a drug deal. I have come across drug deals. We all just turn the other way and continue moving, pretending we didn't see what we saw-the dealers included. Sad, but the current reality in many small towns these days.

To expand off of this, the area in question really is not all that big/large.

attachment.php


From the former parking area to the bridge was a 6-7+ minute walk. The length of the bridge is roughly half that distance.

My quasi-baseball diamond path is roughly a half mile long. Then there's the short distance from the CS to the cemetery.

It's a tight spot, folks, and as far as I can tell, there are only two trails on public lands. Roughly 2/3 of the land in that image is private land, to include the bridge which is owned by CSX, or was up until recent times.

Not much space for a meth lab to go undetected, especially during the winter months.

Switching gears, a good friend owns a horse farm in South Carolina. Drives the entire perimeter of the 600 acre property once a month. More often than not, he finds evidence of a "mobile meth lab". He works 70 hours/week at his regular gig, in addition to running the horse farm, otherwise he'd drive around the property more often.

Quite frankly, these are more common than meth labs found in the woods. My understanding is meth labs are more common in apartments, abandoned farm houses, vans/cars (car trunks and the backs of work vans), than just out in the woods, like a weed growing operation, or a grain alcohol still.

JMO
 

Attachments

  • Delphi murders distances.jpg
    Delphi murders distances.jpg
    121.4 KB · Views: 494
To expand off of this, the area in question really is not all that big/large.

attachment.php


From the former parking area to the bridge was a 6-7+ minute walk. The length of the bridge is roughly half that distance.

My quasi-baseball diamond path is roughly a half mile long. Then there's the short distance from the CS to the cemetery.

It's a tight spot, folks, and as far as I can tell, there are only two trails on public lands. Roughly 2/3 of the land in that image is private land, to include the bridge which is owned by CSX, or was up until recent times.

Not much space for a meth lab to go undetected, especially during the winter months.

Switching gears, a good friend owns a horse farm in South Carolina. Drives the entire perimeter of the 600 acre property once a month. More often than not, he finds evidence of a "mobile meth lab". He works 70 hours/week at his regular gig, in addition to running the horse farm, otherwise he'd drive around the property more often.

Quite frankly, these are more common than meth labs found in the woods. My understanding is meth labs are more common in apartments, abandoned farm houses, vans/cars (car trunks and the backs of work vans), than just out in the woods, like a weed growing operation, or a grain alcohol still.

JMO

Right. Meth labs tend to be in abandoned places. It takes a long time to cook meth. You don't want to do it out in the open where people will just randomly walk upon you because it's not the kind of substance that you can just pick up and run with. You WILL occasionally find remnants of portable meth labs (empty milk gallon jugs, Clorox bottles, etc.) halfheartedly buried under some leaves in the woods but, as a general rule, you need some cover up in the cooking of it.
 
Gray Hughes has another great video up on his YouTube channel:

[video=youtube;cTvPXfFltSo]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cTvPXfFltSo[/video]

_______________________________________________________________________________

I'm with GH, this case has brought out some real wing nuts and attention *advertiser censored* on social media.
 
Right. Meth labs tend to be in abandoned places. It takes a long time to cook meth. You don't want to do it out in the open where people will just randomly walk upon you because it's not the kind of substance that you can just pick up and run with. You WILL occasionally find remnants of portable meth labs (empty milk gallon jugs, Clorox bottles, etc.) halfheartedly buried under some leaves in the woods but, as a general rule, you need some cover up in the cooking of it.

Great points.

I work as a contractor in manufacturing, from time to time. I worked in Pierceton, IN, in 2010 and 2011, and got a feel for how bad meth is in rural Indiana, just listening to radio news reports. Moved back to Indiana two years ago.

LE at that time had come up with "sniffer" vans/trucks, with sensors on the outsides of them, to sniff out labs not far off of roads, and the mobile meth labs I mentioned above. I've heard of them used in many states, these days, and have seen them in Indiana and South Carolina.
 
I watched the interview and something he said made me wonder if BG was dropped off at that location. I've kinda wondered from the beginning if he saw the girls get dropped off from the road and saw an opportunity. Kind of in line with the RL barn incident, what if someone(s) were out scouting for houses to break in. A weekday afternoon would be the perfect time to do so. We're had a lot of recent breaking and entering crimes lately in a nearby town and almost all of the accused were from a town about 45 minutes to an hour away with no known ties to the area. All were rural residences during the day while homeowners were at work. I have no doubt they thought by "working" so far from home, the likelihood of being caught was slim. Luckily, one crew was caught because a neighbor noticed the IL license plate outside the house. She called police just to check it out because she'd never seen an IL plate at that home before and knew her neighbors were at work.

We can disagree and still be friends. I think the Sgt. is explaining the difficulty of doing such a thing as crossing the creek almost to the point of the impossibility of it. There was no island that day as it was covered with water. I do not think the girls could have made it a quarter of a mile in near freezing cold water. Our bodies are not equipped to handle those low temps for that length of time. Besides their wet clothes and shoes would be slowing them down tremendously. Furthermore, they would be fighting/ swimming/walking against the current. It seems logical to me that they did not enter the creek. Also, how do you know he did not have a car?

Large portions of Deer Creek are very shallow and the current isn't that strong. There are definitely deeper holes (as was shown in the news clips of searchers) as well. IMO, BG had control over them from the beginning, shortly after the video still we were shown was taken. He led them "down the hill". I'm sure he was in close contact as he forced them to their final resting place. If they did cross the creek, I'm sure it was a shallow area. If BG was wearing boots, his feet may not have gotten wet at all. He wouldn't have wanted to walk in deep cold water and I don't think he allowed the girls to get away from him.

I've crossed many shallow creeks in the middle of winter while I'm out hunting. I normally try to step over the water, but sometimes I don't quite make it. Stepping in shallow freezing water is only chilly for a very short while. Sometimes it temporarily feels like your feet are breaking depending on just how cold and how long the exposure lasts. But as soon as you start taking steps out of the water and the extra water is forced out, your feet start warming up instantly. Wet pants are a huge bummer and probably more uncomfortable than wet feet. With everything that was going on, the combination of fear and adrenaline, they probably wouldn't have even noticed the cold.
 
HMMM...did he have a car parked there under the bridge? Has anyone mentioned a car under the bridge? Logic says to me, he didn't have a car on the road, by or under the bridge. Had he loaded them in a car, we may still be looking for them.
MOO

Please offer your theory on HOW the girls got from the SE portion of the bridge, back across the road and the creek, to be found 1/2 mile upstream on the other side.

You bring up good points, and I will take on your challenge.

I have never believed the girls crossed the creek.

It's my belief the perp planned these murders way in advance. In fact, I think he planned everything down to the very last detail, including the route to where their bodies were found.

He was not about to leave something that critically important to the elements of running water. The girls could have slipped on wet rocks, or even managed to get away from him downstream. They could have been seen by casual observers from the bridge or other vantage points.

He wasn't going to risk that!

More importantly, HE could have slipped on wet rocks, or dropped any of his weapons, concealed beneath his jacket. He had waited too long for this day. He was not about to risk his plans to the unpredictable elements of the water.

I agree with DeDee. I don't think Sgt. Holeman was saying they DID cross the creek. On the contrary, I think he was actually pointing out all the obstacles as to why they didn't.

I'm a person who often reads between the lines. For whatever reason, I don't think he minded if this was not spelled out clearly. That's my impression anyway.

I realize people interpret his words differently, and they may be correct.

You asked how I think he got them to the other side? The exact way you think did not happen - by automobile.

I believe he had his car parked on that private road located off the south end of the bridge. Though he knew it posed a slight chance of being seen, I believe he had checked out the nearby homes ahead of time, and saw no imminent risk. He knew his car wouldn't be there very long. This crime would be quick.

It was carried out with military precision. I believe the 'down the hill,' led straight to his car where he quickly hustled the girls into the trunk. Just mere minutes after leaving the bridge.

Imo, that's why no one saw or heard them after he grabbed them.

I think he did drive them around to the other side, hence the 'phone pinging around town' statement made by Libby's father. I know various towers can have the same phone pinging while the phone is not moving, but I don't believe that's what happened here. I think the phone was actually in transit.

I don't have any article or media source to back this up. It's my opinion only, but it fits my theory of how carefully planned this crime was. The perp made sure he covered all his bases ahead of time.

So the girls crossing the water makes absolutely no sense to me, from the perp's point of view.

Again, I may be completely wrong. There may actually be 'nothing' to even be read between the lines. Wouldn't be the first time I've been wrong, for sure.

You asked though for the 'why and how' theory from anyone who believed differently, so this is my opinion. Based solely upon my gut feeling only.

Want to add too, I'm not at all convinced it's just one perp either. I thought it was for a long time, but now I'm not so sure...
 
Well, you can pick up where I left off or I can continue. It is HARD without my machine to pause. Going back just a few seconds is really difficult when you have two screens to deal with!

FWIW .... apparently someone has already copy/pasted this to TOPIX and I am one very unhappy camper! :fuse::fuse: Do you even have a clue how hard it is to do without a proper machine, and with arthritic fingers? Now, if they asked me first, I may have said "go ahead" but without permission of the poster that is really rudeness to the max. :sheesh:

JMO

Its incredibly rude Spell and I totally understand your frustration but we here on WS know who did the hard work and we appreciate the fact that you (and your numb fingers )took the time to get the information out there xx
 
did police release more audio from Libby's phone? or share it with the parents?
does the recording include the girls talking about a man behind them?
 
You bring up good points, and I will take on your challenge.

I have never believed the girls crossed the creek.

It's my belief the perp planned these murders way in advance. In fact, I think he planned everything down to the very last detail, including the route to where their bodies were found.

He was not about to leave something that critically important to the elements of running water. The girls could have slipped on wet rocks, or even managed to get away from him downstream. They could have been seen by casual observers from the bridge or other vantage points.

He wasn't going to risk that!

More importantly, HE could have slipped on wet rocks, or dropped any of his weapons, concealed beneath his jacket. He had waited too long for this day. He was not about to risk his plans to the unpredictable elements of the water.

I agree with DeDee. I don't think Sgt. Holeman was saying they DID cross the creek. On the contrary, I think he was actually pointing out all the obstacles as to why they didn't.

I'm a person who often reads between the lines. For whatever reason, I don't think he minded if this was not spelled out clearly. That's my impression anyway.

I realize people interpret his words differently, and they may be correct.

You asked how I think he got them to the other side? The exact way you think did not happen - by automobile.

I believe he had his car parked on that private road located off the south end of the bridge. Though he knew it posed a slight chance of being seen, I believe he had checked out the nearby homes ahead of time, and saw no imminent risk. He knew his car wouldn't be there very long. This crime would be quick.

It was carried out with military precision. I believe the 'down the hill,' led straight to his car where he quickly hustled the girls into the trunk. Just mere minutes after leaving the bridge.

Imo, that's why no one saw or heard them after he grabbed them.

I think he did drive them around to the other side, hence the 'phone pinging around town' statement made by Libby's father. I know various towers can have the same phone pinging while the phone is not moving, but I don't believe that's what happened here. I think the phone was actually in transit.

I don't have any article or media source to back this up. It's my opinion only, but it fits my theory of how carefully planned this crime was. The perp made sure he covered all his bases ahead of time.

So the girls crossing the water makes absolutely no sense to me, from the perp's point of view.

Again, I may be completely wrong. There may actually be 'nothing' to even be read between the lines. Wouldn't be the first time I've been wrong, for sure.

You asked though for the 'why and how' theory from anyone who believed differently, so this is my opinion. Based solely upon my gut feeling only.

Want to add too, I'm not at all convinced it's just one perp either. I thought it was for a long time, but now I'm not so sure...

If the perp had the girls in the car, why not just ride off with them and dispose of the body elsewhere? It's an interesting theory, but it feels kind of complicated to me.
 
Good points Jazz Tune. TY for sharing your theory.

Why put them in the car and drive them around to, the cemetery? and carry them down? force them to walk down? How in broad daylight? Or do you theorize he went somewhere else with the girls and then brought them back under darkness?

Your theory was he planned it so as to not risk being seen from the bridge crossing the water? Then why accost them in broad daylight on the bridge where anyone could have happened along?
 
You bring up good points, and I will take on your challenge.

I have never believed the girls crossed the creek.

It's my belief the perp planned these murders way in advance. In fact, I think he planned everything down to the very last detail, including the route to where their bodies were found.

He was not about to leave something that critically important to the elements of running water. The girls could have slipped on wet rocks, or even managed to get away from him downstream. They could have been seen by casual observers from the bridge or other vantage points.

He wasn't going to risk that!

More importantly, HE could have slipped on wet rocks, or dropped any of his weapons, concealed beneath his jacket. He had waited too long for this day. He was not about to risk his plans to the unpredictable elements of the water.

I agree with DeDee. I don't think Sgt. Holeman was saying they DID cross the creek. On the contrary, I think he was actually pointing out all the obstacles as to why they didn't.

I'm a person who often reads between the lines. For whatever reason, I don't think he minded if this was not spelled out clearly. That's my impression anyway.

I realize people interpret his words differently, and they may be correct.

You asked how I think he got them to the other side? The exact way you think did not happen - by automobile.

I believe he had his car parked on that private road located off the south end of the bridge. Though he knew it posed a slight chance of being seen, I believe he had checked out the nearby homes ahead of time, and saw no imminent risk. He knew his car wouldn't be there very long. This crime would be quick.

It was carried out with military precision. I believe the 'down the hill,' led straight to his car where he quickly hustled the girls into the trunk. Just mere minutes after leaving the bridge.

Imo, that's why no one saw or heard them after he grabbed them.

I think he did drive them around to the other side, hence the 'phone pinging around town' statement made by Libby's father. I know various towers can have the same phone pinging while the phone is not moving, but I don't believe that's what happened here. I think the phone was actually in transit.

I don't have any article or media source to back this up. It's my opinion only, but it fits my theory of how carefully planned this crime was. The perp made sure he covered all his bases ahead of time.

So the girls crossing the water makes absolutely no sense to me, from the perp's point of view.

Again, I may be completely wrong. There may actually be 'nothing' to even be read between the lines. Wouldn't be the first time I've been wrong, for sure.

You asked though for the 'why and how' theory from anyone who believed differently, so this is my opinion. Based solely upon my gut feeling only.

Want to add too, I'm not at all convinced it's just one perp either. I thought it was for a long time, but now I'm not so sure...

So you think the phone was in the trunk with the girls pinging around town and Libby would not have dialed 911 while they were in the trunk?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
249
Guests online
361
Total visitors
610

Forum statistics

Threads
607,984
Messages
18,232,613
Members
234,266
Latest member
NotSoElementary
Back
Top