I'm coming in late on this one, but is anyone considering the mum? She's potentially on drugs, had William taken off her by the department and potentially is not the most law abiding citizen. The circumstances of the abduction suggest someone who knew the grandmother's home quite well and who...
Seems like he's moving on with his life. Good on him. After the terrible media circus, one can only imagine how bad it would have been for GT. I hope he's making something of himself.
There's no disdain, both the income earner and the parent have an equally important role in society. Oh, I forgot, the joy of child raising is considered 'oppression.'
Source? Statistically, his father probably brought in the wealth and high earnings, but I accept it's his family's money as his parent's likely both contributed equally in their natural gender roles.
He's innocent. He hasn't done anything wrong.
He won the case - in any other jurisdiction he'd get indemnity costs.
This would have cost him $200,000 at least. His father deserves to recoup some of his retirement fund.
The prosecution knows it has no case. It's hoping to convict on emotion and moral culpability alone. You think the prosecution doesn't know and rely on 'The Courier Mail' effect?
I think if the poll is anything to go by, 25% believe he's not guilty. If the snapshot of WS is anything to go by (and I wouldn't by it as an ordinary sample of society) that's plenty enough to hang a jury up like a wet coat-hanger.
Just stop for a minute and put yourself in his shoes right...
I think if the poll is anything to go by, 25% believe he's not guilty. If the snapshot of WS is anything to go by (and I wouldn't by it as an ordinary sample of society) that's plenty enough to hang a jury up like a wet coat-hanger.
Just stop for a minute and put yourself in his shoes right...
There's no point now,
The jig is up,
Trial by media,
It's always going to be tough
Gable Tostee
He stuck it out
Delicious home cooked dinners
He will never go without
The jury was clever
Through the lies they could see
That GT was innocent
And now he walks free.
Shultz
"The second question was: Could you please clarify the homeowners right to remove a person behaving in a disorderly manner. Does removal to the balcony constitute removal from the property?
Justice Byrne replied: The answer is yes.
Oh no. Doesn't look good for team guilty.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.