Search results

To me, if the sighting is true, then it doesn't sound like Kayleigh's murder was planned..I mean who is going to venture out into public where you can be spotted if you intend on killing her hours later Sent from my SM-N910F using Tapatalk

Rainbowskies post ^^this completely ^^ Sent from my SM-N910F using Tapatalk

See I was 16 when I got with my eldest daughters father (we're not together anymore) and he was 26 so perhaps that's why the age thing isn't really an issue for me Sent from my SM-N910F using Tapatalk

100% with you...There's nothing we have seen so far to say that LH did this regularly I. E that he was grooming on the regs or a sexual predator. Sure what he did was wrong, no denying that but this happens day in day out, just look in the papers. If kayleigh was alive and people found out...

Doesn't shock me in the slightest...she is one slick madam Sent from my SM-N910F using Tapatalk

Perhaps they'd met up before and there's some kind of evidence of this? Sent from my SM-N910F using Tapatalk

Yep that also allows us to ask you questions without you having to find links to back up all your answers Sent from my SM-N910F using Tapatalk

You misunderstand me - im not talkong about messages to parents or on the days she went missing.I'm sure if he were grooming her that there is a slew of messages between kayleigh and LH in the lead up to her disappearance. Do we know for sure that this is the first time shed met LH? Sent from...

Sorry, messages showing that kayleigh was consenting or had consented to sexual activity Sent from my SM-N910F using Tapatalk

Post mortem may not have been done but a preliminary one may have been..that could pick up rape.. I think that LHs charged have stemmed from phone/message evidence. I don't think they have anything physical on him..however though how they've linked SB to this crime I dunno. LHs charges don't...

Or messages with Kayleigh agreeing Sent from my SM-N910F using Tapatalk

Wouldn't fall under that offence - have just posted a very informative link Sent from my SM-N910F using Tapatalk

Your are right sexual activity with a child is in person however inciting sexual activity with a child can be done online. Some light reading for anyone who's interested...

I'm wondering if the grooming stems from their social media exchanges, because of the difference in ages..but of a coincidence that one bloke grooms her and then his friend decides to take it upon himself to separately rape and murder her... Thinking out loud.. LHs charges don't imply that he...

Suprised there's not a kidnap/abduction charge in there somewhere...implies that the poor girl went there willingly Sent from my SM-N910F using Tapatalk

O/t I was shocked to see that given their side of the family's statement Sent from my SM-N910F using Tapatalk

B & m again.... Sent from my SM-N910F using Tapatalk

Exactly if they believed that she got changed that kind of implies she had a change of clothes with her..if she did then it's highly likely shed have been meeting her friend so they could go out. It would mean carrying her bag around Sent from my SM-N910F using Tapatalk

Could have been dossing there.. Can't imagine it was a long term thing with it only being a one bedroom property Sent from my SM-N910F using Tapatalk

Well yes planning permission was only granted mid 2013 so I'd have thought the site wouldn't have been signed off until the beginning if this year Sent from my SM-N910F using Tapatalk