And we have come full circle. That's why I said in my first post to you - "The guy is a liar. The irrationality is that you cherry pick parts of what he said as truth."
You seriously don't know his lies?? Really??
Ok here is an extract since you think everything is overemphasis his gayness - you can google search. This was when Max Clifford was still free and taking clients (of course this dude is in jail as well haha).
"Dewani strongly denies the claims and...
No idea what you are saying. What is "We can accept that there was intent to kill, but we have to balance this with the prosecution charge that OP intended to kill an innocent person."??
Man, can the real websleuthers please stand up. No one gives a fig about the guy's gay experience or infidelity. He can hump guys, girls, animals or a combination of everything if he wants. It's the fact that he lied about this. He also lied numerous times on what had happened as well. The guy...
Man another case in South Africa like this. Is the police that incompetent or are judges really that stupid in SA?? Maybe SA doesn't understand circumstantial evidence??
Since Masipa now has very similar arguments to Kelly Phelps, if Kelly Phelps thinks it is unlikely he will be jailed, then I think that's the verdict...sad...
Agreed. OP said he smashed the door and saw the key on the floor. But if you looked at the hole and the floor, it looks very hard to stick your arm and grab the key on the ground. I don't think there was a key at all from the inside.
The truth is the guy is a provern liar but his story is still reasonably true. Thats so illogical and yet Masipa and yourself and others still asserts it.
With other witnesses, they aren't even proven liars and their evidence is totally dismissed.
Also any improbable explanation is taken to...
Agreed. Double standards by Masipa and other OP supporters. State witnesses mistakes time, and they dismiss their testimony. OP is a proven liar and they confirm that his story is 'reasonably true'. Hahaha
Beginner websleuthers. They still need to learn how to websleuth properly.
Well if we use that line of reasoning, the whole OP testimony should be thrown out too. But Masipa didn't. And people wonder why many people is saying Masipa is selecting her evidence to suit her needs.
In addition to this, the defense never provided evidence of the shots being in quick succession or any evidence that OP was a fearful person. In fact we had evidence to the contrary but somehow Masipa ignored all of this and just believed the defense claims. I really don't understand.
So we are resorting to using other people's voices as the evidence to back OP's claims? Hahaha
In that case, can we all do a search on google for double taps, GAD, multiple personality disorder, etc. Haha
But you know the irony is? Masipa didn't even need such evidence because she just...
I have a feeling the first punishment was the fact that he killed Reeva and he had to cry some much for Reeva and had to be inconvenienced by the trial. Man, looking back, I feel like an idiot now to think Masipa actually was gonna give OP a harsh sentence.
Agreed. Trying to use Greenland's point to justify OP action is similar to all the selective use of evidence that people who agree with the judgment is doing.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.