gcharlie
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Mar 7, 2013
- Messages
- 2,143
- Reaction score
- 284
Half of the time Willmott has to prompt Nurmi to object. It's kind of ironic that the lawyer who talks and talks and talks and talks for weeks and weeks needs instructions about when to pipe up with the most relevant word or two.
I also get a kick out of him saying "beyond the scope"... He goes on for two hours about irrelevant relationship issues from when JA was 19, they had nothing to do with the juror questions. Juan zeroes in on gas cans and specific issues relating to the murder, the coverup, and the juror questions and Nurmi's objection is "beyond the scope". It's not namecalling, it's just poor lawyering (though I do have a list full of names here).
Also, if you listen to Nurmi, he's not the brightest tool in the shed. His command of English is horrendous, and like JA, he tries to use big words without really knowing their meaning.