How does that contradict the question? I'm not following you.
Of course GZ never mentioned or admitted to chasing or running after TM.
He was too busy walking back to his car a few minutes earlier, remember? :rocker:
The Huffington Post said:
But that contradicts what De La Rionda asked at the hearing and that Gilbreath agreed to:The pursuit, in the direction of Martin's home, indicates that Zimmerman initiated the confrontation, Gilbreath said, under questioning from Rionda.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/0...n_1440175.html
DE LA RIONDA: But you still have, is it not true, a witness who describes someone chasing another person from the area where they ended up... in other words, from where, near where Mr. Martin lived to the area where the murder happened?
GILBREATH: Yes.
To me, what De La Rionda asked implies that the chase was away from where Trayvon was staying while what the HuffPost stated was that the pursuit was towards it. That's the contradiction I am seeing and it changes things a lot if Trayvon were being chased away from home!
At one point you did the calculations on how much time it would have taken GZ to get to the end of the block near the townhouse where the Martins were staying - it was from the idea that Trayvon was "sitting on the back porch" as stated by Tracy Martin's fiance. Once it was realized that she didn't mean it literally you scrapped that idea. The timing worked if I remember correctly, even if the premise it was based on didn't.
But what if Trayvon HAD gotten home or nearly home and GZ showed up right there and cut him off? I keep seeing different ideas for where GZ's SUV was parked - I'd really like to know exactly where it was when LE showed up. That could answer some questions.
IMO, JMO, etc.