MADJGNLAW
Active Member
- Joined
- Sep 24, 2008
- Messages
- 5,525
- Reaction score
- -4
I could not understand why Baez did not fight the release of these letters and I now think I understand why. IMO...it's because of four main reasons.
1.Baez didn't read them. If some on the defense did, they skimmed them over.
2.The judge had already said, he was not inclined to seal them.
3.Defense knew the letters were not privileged.
4.So that they can impeach or casting doubt in George/Cindy's statements in the future.
I don't feel Casey ever thought these letters would surface either and I do feel that there are a lot of half truths to what she wrote about.
1.Baez didn't read them. If some on the defense did, they skimmed them over.
2.The judge had already said, he was not inclined to seal them.
3.Defense knew the letters were not privileged.
4.So that they can impeach or casting doubt in George/Cindy's statements in the future.
I don't feel Casey ever thought these letters would surface either and I do feel that there are a lot of half truths to what she wrote about.
CASEY'S NEWEST LAWYER BRINGS NEW DYNAMIC TO DEFENSE
Mason brings to the defense table 40 years of experience cross-examining witnesses hostile to the defense.
"Snip" http://www.wftv.com/news/23053460/detail.html
April 5, 2010
Cheney Mason, says he can get Casey off, despite the evidence against her.
Recently, more damning evidence has come to light coming directly from Casey in 50 letters she wrote to another inmate.
WFTV asked Mason about it last week and obviously hit a nerve.
We're gonna take a look at it and see whether it's privileged
Im not gonna answer any more questions about it.
The judge has said he's not inclined to.
Mason brings a dynamic, not seen yet, to Casey's defense team. He bombastic inside and outside of court and he's already made claims he'll get a not guilty verdict in Casey's murder case.
WFTV legal analyst Bill Sheaffer says what Mason brings to the defense table is 40 years of experience cross-examining witnesses hostile to the defense.
Either impeaching them or casting doubt on their credibility, so that he can argue to the jury, You should discount their testimony based on what I brought out during cross examination, therefore there's reasonable doubt, Sheaffer explained.