2011.02.24 Deviant images & *advertiser censored* found on a computer and memory stick

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Status
Not open for further replies.
http://www.ktxs.com/big_country_news/27009657/detail.html

It does seem that the media is havinbg difficulty getting the story exactly right:
(BBM)
"KTXS reported Friday, that a computer memory stick with child *advertiser censored*, as well as more than 100 thousand other graphic images, was taken by officials from Billie's home.
Shawn Adkins, Billie's boyfriend, lived there at the time.
They also collected evidence of *advertiser censored* from Shawn Adkins mother's home in Big Spring."


It looks like they are saying there were 100,000+ images on the flash drive and "evidence of" more on his mom's computer.
"Evidence of *advertiser censored*"? Not ACTUAL *advertiser censored*? THAT sounds like the images were either in the browser cache or deleted. But they got the flash drive bit wrong, so I am sure I am reading too much into the wording.
Has anyone interviewed SA or mom, over all of this?
 
Snipped from article:

"Most people that are into stuff like that...they're more into it for the pleasure than actually doing any physical harm," she said.


http://bigcountryhomepage.com/fulltext/?nxd_id=346916

First: A big THANK YOU to the searchers for continuing to search for Hailey!

Second: Child *advertiser censored* is a physical, emotional, psychological, spiritual act of despicable harm against a child, even if that child is not Hailey.

Third: I don't have the stats in front of me right now, but there is a body of evidence that demonstrates that a percentage of those who possess/view child *advertiser censored* have personally acted out or will act out in a sexually violent manner against children.

Fourth: I don't fault the searcher for not being aware of this fact.

Nevertheless, it's time for public education and for public awareness.

Fifth: A big THANK YOU to Traffic 911 for helping to educate and for bringing awareness of this heinous crime against humanity!
 
a very interesting post by a fellow WSer.
Brainwashing by parents with child *advertiser censored* etc
[ame="http://www.websleuths.com/forums/showthread.php?t=66879"]Websleuths Crime Sleuthing Community[/ame]
 
I think that victimizes victims.

If police show up at my house and arrest my spouse for downloading child *advertiser censored* under his own user name on a shared computer, unbeknownst to me, do you think that while I am busy falling apart at the seams to learn this horrifying information about someone I thought I knew and trusted, they should throw a pair of those handcuffs on me as well? Hell to the no!

Likewise if police come to my home to arrest my teen for marijuana possession, or shoplifting, do you feel that I am equally guilty, in spite of having know knowledge that these activities were occurring?

ETA: I believe that refers to being ignorant of the law you have violated, not being ignorant of criminal activity in your home.


She admitted that SA was the one who brought over the memory stick that was confiscated. I just don't believe that she didn't know what was on said memory stick. She couldn't tell the truth if her life depended on it. MOO.
 
Every child depicted in a child *advertiser censored* image or video has been harmed, both by the producer of that image/video AND by the possessor/viewer.

Pleasure be damned.
 
I think she only admitted it was Shawn's because it might have her prints on it...and she knows it will have his.
 
Searcher Stephanie Boyd said although she's disturbed by the findings, she believes it has little to do with Hailey's case.

"Most people that are into stuff like that...they're more into it for the pleasure than actually doing any physical harm," she said.


http://bigcountryhomepage.com/fulltext/?nxd_id=346916

*facepalm*

Are there really people who, in 2011, with all the information available, are that ignorant about child *advertiser censored* and pedophilia?

I hope to God that woman doesn't have kids. They are at great risk.
 
Lloyd said her group plans to continue focusing their efforts on Hailey rather than Billie and Shawn.

"Everybody has their opinion. To each their own. We're not out here to judge them, we're just out here to help find their child," she said.


To each their own? About child *advertiser censored*? Child *advertiser censored* is okay if that's your 'thing'? Don't judge people into child *advertiser censored*?

What the hell-o is wrong with the people in that town???!!!???

Oh my God I'm floored.

http://bigcountryhomepage.com/fulltext/?nxd_id=346916
 
Searcher Stephanie Boyd said although she's disturbed by the findings, she believes it has little to do with Hailey's case.

"Most people that are into stuff like that...they're more into it for the pleasure than actually doing any physical harm," she said.


http://bigcountryhomepage.com/fulltext/?nxd_id=346916

*facepalm*

Are there really people who, in 2011, with all the information available, are that ignorant about child *advertiser censored* and pedophilia?

I hope to God that woman doesn't have kids. They are at great risk.

If this isn't a misquote, or because she didn't know about the child aspect of the *advertiser censored*, I'd have to think this crime is rampant in those parts.

But, I really think she's going to be mortified when she hears about her own statement. jmo
 
If this isn't a misquote, or because she didn't know about the child aspect of the *advertiser censored*, I'd have to think this crime is rampant in those parts.

But, I really think she's going to be mortified when she hears about her own statement. jmo

There is something seriously, seriously, seriously wrong in that town.

And no, I just went back and re-read the article, and no, I don't think it was a misquote at all.
 
*advertiser censored* to her may be a Playboy magazine, she may have no idea what this REALLY is............
KWIM
 
*advertiser censored* to her may be a Playboy magazine, she may have no idea what this REALLY is............
KWIM
That is what I was thinking.
I had no idea it was definitely this serious until whatever time it was I asked for clarification upthread this afternoon. NO idea at all.

Bestiality and childporn would make normal people literally sick, imo.
 
OMG - I think I overlooked this statement in the article earlier!

"Everybody has their opinion. To each their own. We're not out here to judge them, we're just out here to help find their child," she [Stephanie Boyd] said.

http://bigcountryhomepage.com/fulltext/?nxd_id=346916

Uh - darlin' - child *advertiser censored* is ILLEGAL. Opinion ain't got nothin' to do with it!

Nevertheless, I'll offer my opinion - it's depraved, it's despicable, it's repulsive, it's repugnant, it's reprehensible.

ETA: I would also like to add that it's EVIL in every sense of the word.
 
This must have hit Cz like a ton of bricks. You still hanging in there, Cz?
 
I really don't think she would have said what she did had she known or comprehended the severity or extent of what was found.
 
With the volume of images - over 108,000 - I suspect distribution, and I wouldn't be surprised if LE & the DA are suspecting the same.

According to the Texas Penal Code, if there are 6 or more identical images, that constitutes intent to distribute, and is a 2nd degree felony (whereas possession, I believe, is a 3rd degree felony), as well as possibly a federal crime if the images were distributed/transported across state lines. Since the internet is involved, it's more than likely transport across state lines occurred.

I think investigators will try to bring the maximum charges possible with regards to the *advertiser censored*. It's likely the FBI has been called in to assist with the investigation.

It's like if the DEA busts someone with a kilo of pot - that person can be charged with drug trafficking, especially if that person also possesses a scale & other paraphernalia. A kilo of pot is not for personal use, no matter how much of a pothead someone might be.

IMO, 108,000+ images of perverse illegal *advertiser censored* is NOT for personal use. Ugh.

In addition, I believe each image constitutes 1 count. When the number is tallied, there could be charges of 1,000s of counts of illegal *advertiser censored* possession and/or distribution (depending on how many of those images are child *advertiser censored*).

It goes without saying that child *advertiser censored* is one of the most vile, despicable crimes against humanity.

Yet, there sits Billie with her doe eyes, "in the dark", pretending to not know what all the outrage is about.

BBM and JMO but what you have written is by far one of the very scariest aspects of this case. That this women can not comprehend why people are outraged......
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
104
Guests online
799
Total visitors
903

Forum statistics

Threads
599,288
Messages
18,093,939
Members
230,841
Latest member
FastRayne
Back
Top