BigFatMommyDog
Active Member
- Joined
- Aug 20, 2008
- Messages
- 4,932
- Reaction score
- -25
maybe they will do a live demonstration with the dogs? Nah, I know but that would be cool.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I don't believe they should be allowed to smell the odor. They won't know what they are smelling other than what they have been told, so likley they will believe that it must be decomp because they have never smelled anything else like that. And they really are not in a position to judge, if they have never smelled it before.
I don't believe they should be allowed to smell the odor. They won't know what they are smelling other than what they have been told, so likley they will believe that it must be decomp because they have never smelled anything else like that. And they really are not in a position to judge, if they have never smelled it before.
In response to UKLaw - the jury is not being asked to identify this smell are they? It is not going to be identified as the smell as decomp - simply to smell these items.
I believe as long as the SA is not asking for ID or conclusions by the jury this can be allowed.
Identified as "an odour" only, to clarify...
I know! I've been trying to figure out why he didn't just admit the body was in the trunk and blame it on GA.
Are these all the hairs that Dr. Lee found???
the state is so ORGANISED. contrast that with the DT :|
Why is Baez up in her business!
It would be nice if the Pros would state the relevance of each piece of evidence instead of just introducing & publishing.
They must be planning on doing something with it all at once?
It would be nice if the Pros would state the relevance of each piece of evidence instead of just introducing & publishing.
They must be planning on doing something with it all at once?