Lanie
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- May 16, 2007
- Messages
- 2,843
- Reaction score
- 38
I have a question..The TH are saying it appears Caylee was killed, but no proof she was killed by ICA. Was ICA not the only person involved in this case, off drinking, screwing and having an all around good time, without ever trying to find out where her daughter was? CA, GA and LA were trying to find her and Caylee....ICA was the one lying about where she was, where Caylee was, and when they would see her again. ICA was the one in coverup mode. ICA knew what she had done. That is all of the proof I need that she did it.
IMO, it feels like most of these people have to leave every ounce of common sense and at least 30 points of their IQ at home to report on this case.
As soon as the story came out, child missing and mother didn't report it for 31 days, even though I kept an open mind, I thought ICA did it. I have yet to hear anything to make me think otherwise. Shortly afterwards, it turned out mother didn't even report her child missing, it was Caylee's grandmother that did it. Then the 911 calls are released, and IMO CA was practically forcing ICA to talk to LE.
As far as I'm concerned, this case started out at a very, very low point and it has gone downhill ever since. I'm not going to feel guilty, or feel like a bad person, or second-guess what I know to be the facts of this case because some people feel the need to play devil's advocate and/or try and produce every theory they can come up with to try to explain one piece of evidence or another. IMO, Dr. G said it all when she said there is no reason other than homicide for duct tape to be on a child's face. Period.
MOO