OnlineInstructor
No excuses
- Joined
- Nov 17, 2008
- Messages
- 95
- Reaction score
- 5
The jury will NOT sniff her trunk-in-a-can. IMO They don't need to. This is a win for the jury.
I assume they are going to talk about possible perjury and obstruction charges and to advice her to take the 5th.
Do you think ICA is texting? who, CA?
http://media2.myfoxorlando.com/live/casey_cam_shell.html
KC is reading something in her lap. Every once in a while you can see her lift a page to turn it.
I don't think that if KC were texting someone in that court room wouldn't have brought it to JP's attention already. JMHO
Why is ICA allowed to text? I have never seen any defendant do that in court before.
My gut tells me Cindy is up to something. She would not leave otherwise.....
HHJP seems to be a walking talking dictionary of case law. He's pretty amazing.
Not every juror (and maybe none of them) know what human composition smells like. So if one or two jurors say "that smells like a dead body to me" then they are witnessing to the other jurors. I think that's what the judge is getting at. Sure, it stinks, but it it probative?
If its considered experimental and likly to cause mistrial, I think he shouldn't allow it.
the smell stuff scares me a bit because some people have stronger sense of smell than others and some are more sensitive to smell than others.
maybe a lawyer on the board can answer this: wouldn't the jury be able to do that during deliberations if they asked, since the cans are in evidence? TIA
O/T wouldn't it be nice if you could sign up somewhere for a text alert when the jury makes a decision?
IMO we don't need or want the cans in.... this could be an appeal issue. HHJP needs to deny this. The state won't lose anything not having the cans in. MOO