Dr.Fessel
New Member
- Joined
- Sep 2, 2009
- Messages
- 10,903
- Reaction score
- 26
I really believe that too.caller: If the mother is an alcoholic then the 8 year old will be more mature and knowledgeable than we think.
I really believe that too.caller: If the mother is an alcoholic then the 8 year old will be more mature and knowledgeable than we think.
NG: what is the likelihood of a 10 month old child of having blood in their stool?
Yeah, I wouldn't call that tall but some would I guess. I was just thinking maybe these people are very short, lol.
The mystery DNA clarification. NG called it mystery DNA, the reporter at the house said LE needed it to rule out any DNA found in the house. So, if there is extra DNA in the house it may point to an intruder. I just hope they get a sample from everyone else who has been through the house, you know, like the reporter and camera person in that first video walk through.
Now talking about fecal matter not being remains, not normal for 10 mth old to have blood in their diaper. (my grand baby did a few times, constipation).
Maybe he was napping between jobs? I know I have done that.
What???
The local reporter said today that Deb's drinking buddy was watching the kids while Deb went to the store with her brother.if he was napping who was looking after the kids :waitasec: im probably missing something,as usual :innocent:
I quit hearing anything after NG was rude to the caller.
The local reporter said today that Deb's drinking buddy was watching the kids while Deb went to the store with her brother.
The local reporter said today that Deb's drinking buddy was watching the kids while Deb went to the store with her brother.
NG just said they are not protected by the marriage law in that state, but they aren't married.....so why would that matter?
NG just said they are not protected by the marriage law in that state, but they aren't married.....so why would that matter?
NG just said they are not protected by the marriage law in that state, but they aren't married.....so why would that matter?
b/c -if they were married-they do not have to testify against each other!
No problem!thankshard to keep up since i don't have FOX or anything
Well, not exactly because if Missouri has the statue where if the child is under 18 years old, then a spouse can testify against another spouse.
I read the statue this morning, but I can't find the darn thing at this later hour.