In the SC oral argument, they talk a bit about Structural Error.
CJ Rush seemed to agree with Leeman that JG's removal of the D's would be a structural error. My understanding is if the D's had not pushed this to the SC, and RA was found guilty, it is possible this whole trial could have been for nothing. If that's the case, then we should be thankful the D's fought so hard to be reinstated. MOO
One part of the argument I thought was a bit amusing was when the atty for JG said Rozzi and Baldwin
were very experienced and highly competent and then quickly added
in other contexts.
They also mention not having hearings and not having findings. I'm assuming that impacts how the justices make their decisions.