believe09
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 26, 2007
- Messages
- 28,094
- Reaction score
- 539
I believe they are related because of the timing, location and combination. Saturday, Oct. 4 was the day of the first big LE-organized search. The location is totally unnecessary. Those items could have been easily disposed of curbside or in a city dumpster instead of out in the boonies. If a rural person needed to dispose of them, they would probably burn in a barrel or bonfire if they didn't put it in their big weekly bin. The items were something sentimental, something large enough to wrap, and something to clean up and have another drink after hard work. This is not in the Casscoe area.
I think that is what I am trying to get to-why dump items associated with Cassie's disappearance in that area at all if they could be disposed of a hundred different ways, including a barrel fire or something like that? Those items would easily be considered common refuse and would likely not even have caused a second glance if they were dumped in a dumpster or a refuse barrel at any point early on. Early on she was considered a run away.