Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
There is a list here: https://findcassiecompton.wordpress.com/what-we-know/ I made this blog so I feel confident it's safe to link. It is all the information that has come from our discussions, and a few tidbits from beyond WS. I think it needs to be updated, and I would be thankful for any input.Being that JC and BR are still considered suspects can mods create a thread for what we know about them? I'm thinking its time. Maybe an additional thread for all the things that point to it not being JC or BR?
http://www.fox16.com/story/d/story/...gart-teen-speaks/52416/JWVUOmrItkS92-1COXpLTw
This video is especially bothersome to me, at the 5:00 remaining mark (counter goes backwards) When JC is asked about not being involved in the searches her response gives me chills
"It makes ME feel (pause) terrible like (pause) It makes ME feel like they're trying to take over MY daughter"
Maybe I'm reading her all wrong but I just can't get past the "ME" - this isn't about JC. There were people organizing searches and events for CC - who is missing, she should be eternally grateful. Of course she wasn't involved in the searches, she hadn't been cleared of involvement. Unless I missed it, she cried without tears for the first 10+ minutes of the video.
That bothers me a lot, too. But then there are a lot of people who make everything about them, sure it makes them look bad but they weren't necessarily involved. They just feel slighted that they aren't getting the attention they think they deserve. In a local missing persons case I have a personal friend who has made the case all about her, like over the top, if you didn't know any better you'd think she'd raised the missing child as her own based on her FB posts.
That's a really interesting point, iamnotagolem. I feel like there are literally dozens of people in Cassie's case making the case all about them.
Curious about your local case/friend. Does that person have verifiable information that they would have, if they HAD raised the missing child as their own? Because that's what I'm seeing as lacking in Cassie's case, kwim?
I would never refer to my cars as vehicles. I don't know anyone that lives here that would either. Jmo, but I think the word vehicle is like using soda, pop or coke. Depending on where you live depends on what you use. At my house we have multiple SUVs. If I was referring to one of my cars, that's the word we use, we use the specific one. I would first say, the specific type. Then say car or SUV, but most likely car. Actually even truck. Many people here refer to their SUVs as trucks. Not sure my statements are much help, but my point is everyone everywhere selects different choices of words for different things.
I agree- we all use different words for different references. Maybe I should have clarified more- it just strikes me as something to observe/make note of when someone changes terms for something very specific that is common usage in their language or dialect or whatever, mid-conversation.
"I drank a soda at about noon....I mean, a pop at about noon. A Coke."
Just an hypothetical. But do you see what I'm talking about?
I absolutely agree with you. Either she was correcting herself b/c she was saying "truck" out of habit b/c that's what he drives, or she was having trouble remembering to keep it generic.
Yes, that's exactly what I was trying to say.
Why the need to keep that specific term generic? It's not as if no one knew what HS drove that night- or even what vehicles are registered to that address.
I wonder if maybe TS was advised to make that sort of comment more speculative, because the vehicle in question might have insurance coverage under a different name, was purchased or leased under a different name, that sort of thing?
Because if a vehicle is possibly involved in the commission of a crime, the first thing LE usually does is check ownership and registration.
I wonder if it's something as simple as HS being pulled over for something, at some point?
I agree- we all use different words for different references. Maybe I should have clarified more- it just strikes me as something to observe/make note of when someone changes terms for something very specific that is common usage in their language or dialect or whatever, mid-conversation.
"I drank a soda at about noon....I mean, a pop at about noon. A Coke."
Just an hypothetical. But do you see what I'm talking about?
My thought goes a little different.
Scenario: HS drives a truck, it's his truck, it's really all he every drives. Out of habit mom always says "my son's truck", but in fact he was driving a different vehicle, so she quickly corrects herself to vehicle.
JVM Transcript, http://edition.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/1410/13/ijvm.01.html
"SNYDER: Cassie`s mom boyfriend actually saw Cassie get out of his truck, walk up the driveway. She did not speak to the mom`s boyfriend at all when she was walking up the driveway and she went into the house. So I brought that up to him and told him that he seen him get out of my son`s -- seen Cassie get out of my son`s vehicle, so he knew she was no longer with him or with us. "
if she said that, it would be weird, but if it is the quote I read, that isn't how it was said. What I read, and I can't copy it, she said truck and then later on said vehicle. I am just not seeing anything wrong with this. Vehicle is description of what it is, just like using the word car..she already explained it is a truck. To me, it's the equivalent of saying, Susie and she. You don't need to keep repeating Susie.
Agree to disagree?
Something else though- if we are talking about the media reports and all of that. Why the radio silence after that from TS? If you are ok going on record talking about...stuff...why then go entirely off record?
I am not blaming TS at all- I'm truly wondering who she was/is/has been advised by.