JaneSA
New Member
- Joined
- Jul 31, 2015
- Messages
- 1,249
- Reaction score
- 1
I'll try to make my point one more time, then I'll go back to lurking.
The police statement says:
"The phone’s message bank was accessed by the offenders and a woman impersonated Ms Pearce-Stevenson to induce the murdered woman’s mother into sending money to the bank account."
As I said upthread, to me it's feasible that the impersonator spoke to, for example, another friend or family member and asked them to convince Karlie's mother to transfer money. This would qualify as 'inducing'. In other words, the police have not said explicitly in a written statment that someone spoke directly with Karlie's mum.
I can understand how people may read it this way. But I don't think we can assume that that reading is correct.
<Modsnip>
As I said, I will go back to lurking now.
For what it's worth, I agree with you, ninja. I think it is important too.