Australia - 3 dead after eating wild mushrooms, Leongatha, Victoria, Aug 2023

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Status
Not open for further replies.
FWIW the family members were transferred to Austin Hospital in Melbourne where they have a specialized unit to deal with toxins and acute cases.

EP was transferred to Monash Health Centre where she was treated with a saline drip and liver protection meds and released.

The implication is that doctors felt EP’s illness didn’t rise to the same level as her ex relatives. At 48 perhaps she was better able to deal with the toxins. Perhaps she ate smaller amounts.

Her kids are lucky the poisonous mushrooms didn’t contaminate the meat. I’m guessing she also scraped the pate, prosciutto and puff pastry off before serving them.

 
FWIW the family members were transferred to Austin Hospital in Melbourne where they have a specialized unit to deal with toxins and acute cases.

EP was transferred to Monash Health Centre where she was treated with a saline drip and liver protection meds and released.

The implication is that doctors felt EP’s illness didn’t rise to the same level as her ex relatives. At 48 perhaps she was better able to deal with the toxins. Perhaps she ate smaller amounts.

Her kids are lucky the poisonous mushrooms didn’t contaminate the meat. I’m guessing she also scraped the pate, prosciutto and puff pastry off before serving them.





If she did this I highly doubt she fed it to her kids. That’s just her making up a story as if she was actually gonna give to her kids why didn’t she do it on when they got home from being out. Her story is highly suspicious and it doesn’t add up.

IMO
 
Last edited:
If she did this I highly doubt she fed it to her kids. That’s just her making up a story as if she was actually gonna give to her kids why didn’t she do it on when they got home from being out. Her story is highly suspicious and it doesn’t add up.

IMO
Yeah, it’s hard to sort out fact from fantasy right now. If the poison is traced back to the Beef Wellington (LE has the leftovers according to EP) then the next step is determining where the mushrooms came from.

At that point we may hear a new story IMO, one that better matches the forensics.

IMO there’s a slim chance EP did innocently pick the mushrooms but won’t admit to it just yet. And if that’s the case then the evidence will hopefully tell the true story. LE has her electronics.

And if the evidence points to premeditation then it won’t matter what story she puts out.
JMO
 
Yeah, it’s hard to sort out fact from fantasy right now. If the poison is traced back to the Beef Wellington (LE has the leftovers according to EP) then the next step is determining where the mushrooms came from.

At that point we may hear a new story IMO, one that better matches the forensics.

IMO there’s a slim chance EP did innocently pick the mushrooms but won’t admit to it just yet. And if that’s the case then the evidence will hopefully tell the true story. LE has her electronics.

And if the evidence points to premeditation then it won’t matter what story she puts out.
JMO



Yes if this was completely innocent I just can not see how she and the kids avoided the same fate as her guests. imo
 

From this article it sounds like EP presented to hostpital on July 30th, then left the hospital, threw out the dehydrator, fed the kids the same meal that made everyone sick (busy day), then returned to Leongatha hostpital before being sent to Monash by ambulance the following day.

Just a bit suss...
 
LE must have had a tip it would be there, and there would be video footage?
I forget why I was asking when the dehydrator arrived at the tip, but since then I figure: police collected it on 4 August, which is the day the the two women died, and Erin said she took it there after her husband accused her of using it to poison his family. I don't know if he would have been accusing her before they died; perhaps. Anyway, small window.
 
From this article it sounds like EP presented to hostpital on July 30th, then left the hospital, threw out the dehydrator, fed the kids the same meal that made everyone sick (busy day), then returned to Leongatha hostpital before being sent to Monash by ambulance the following day.

Just a bit suss...
Yes. Very suspicious.
She was covering tracks.
 
I lied to police about it because I was afraid I’d lose my children.

I told LE “no comment” initially because I got bad legal advice.
Contradiction right there.

I surmise, she was given the sound advice not to comment but decided to lie instead. Then she sacked the lawyer, blaming bad advice.
 
I forget why I was asking when the dehydrator arrived at the tip, but since then I figure: police collected it on 4 August, which is the day the the two women died, and Erin said she took it there after her husband accused her of using it to poison his family. I don't know if he would have been accusing her before they died; perhaps. Anyway, small window.
I was trying to take a guess on that too. Relying on EP's statement for now that she was at the hospital (which one is not clear) with her two children and Simon was also there - I guessed that it was maybe mid week after that weekend so possibly Tues 1st/Wed 2nd Aug. I figure SP's parents/the in-laws would have been transfered to Melbourne toxicology speciality hospital by then. They first presented to local Hospital Sun 30th as per MSM time-line. I figure EP is claiming she went to the tip after the alleged comment from SP so maybe on Tues or Wed (1st/2nd Aug). Could be later than that. Depends when SP allegedly accused her. MSM first reports that police had found a dehydrator at the tip on Sun 6th Aug but for sure they may have collected it on 4th Aug. All just speculation really. Moo
 
Question for the Australian folks on this board: I'm seeing the dish called both beef Wellington and beef Wellington pie online. I'm American and know it as beef Wellington, and it's served in thick slices cut from one piece of meat. Sky News Australia calls it beef Wellington pie. Is it served differently in Australia, more like individual potpies? I was thinking that if she made individual pies, she could crimp or decorate the crust of four poisoned pies different from the rest.
 
Division of Property?
@Charlot123 said, in part:
"... It was her money, being inherited. However, we don't know what the divorce terms are, given that she is the rich one. Perhaps she had to pay her ex something, and didn't want to?..."
snipped for focus
From these sources, not clear to me how property was or would have been divided.

Australia's Family Law Act
"Part VIII—Property, spousal maintenance and maintenance agreements 306" *

From website of a Victoria law firm:*
"In most cases, Australian courts will consider the totality of the property available for division between the parties. How and when the property was acquired and each party's contributions to property may ultimately have a substantial impact on what each party keeps as their final property settlement outcome.
"Can I protect particular assets from a property settlement claim in the event of a separation?
"As demonstrated above, property is defined broadly for the purposes of Australian family law proceedings.
The only way parties can quarantine or protect particular assets or financial interests from a property settlement claim is to address the division of assets (and exclude the jurisdiction of court) by entering into a financial agreement at the commencement of, during or after a relationship/marriage, pursuant to the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth)."

"Ultimately, unless a financial agreement has been properly prepared and entered into, a former partner may be entitled to property that one party intended to quarantine from a property settlement upon separation – notwithstanding any private understandings or any other agreements that the parties may have had during their relationship."
* What is "property" in Australian family law? | Lander & Rogers
So, if the ex had a claim for properties that Erin bought because they hadn't organized a different division of assets in the case of a divorce, that might make him vulnerable to dying an untimely death?

*****
Erin introduced the idea of "losing custody of the kids". The statement doesn't make much sense in context, but supposing she had a custody issue "on the brain", which caused her to blurt out something about custody at an irrelevant moment?

IMO a family dynamic with someone wanting to get back with an ex and being interviewed and mediated, just seems VERY off. Maybe it was about custody and not about getting back with the -ex? Was Simon trying to end the shared arrangement? Were the kids?
 
If she did this I highly doubt she fed it to her kids. That’s just her making up a story as if she was actually gonna give to her kids why didn’t she do it on when they got home from being out. Her story is highly suspicious and it doesn’t add up.

IMO
The invited guests were presumably already ill by the time EP was feeding leftovers to her kids. A circumspect mom would not be giving any of this meal to kids IMO (and, since she is worried about custody, she might want to appear VERY circumspect), so that sounds like it never happened. It would be unconscionable if she did, actually, since there is likely no way to prevent the toxins from leaching into meat and pastry. IMO she fed them steak, not leftovers.
 
I was trying to take a guess on that too. Relying on EP's statement for now that she was at the hospital (which one is not clear) with her two children and Simon was also there - I guessed that it was maybe mid week after that weekend so possibly Tues 1st/Wed 2nd Aug. I figure SP's parents/the in-laws would have been transfered to Melbourne toxicology speciality hospital by then. They first presented to local Hospital Sun 30th as per MSM time-line. I figure EP is claiming she went to the tip after the alleged comment from SP so maybe on Tues or Wed (1st/2nd Aug). Could be later than that. Depends when SP allegedly accused her. MSM first reports that police had found a dehydrator at the tip on Sun 6th Aug but for sure they may have collected it on 4th Aug. All just speculation really. Moo
Police are forensically testing the dehydrator, which was first seized from the Koonwarra transfer station.
9News understands the dehydrator was seized by police from a bin on Friday.

The article is from Wednesday 9 August: "Friday" would be 4 August. "Understands", though, isn't altogether conclusive.
 
I am wondering why the children have been put into State Care? rather than with the father - is that because of his health condition? or for another reason.

Might not mean anything or are they worried he is involved and just being cautious in case???


I realise he has the trauma of his parents passing to deal with - but is this unusual for him not to get care of his children.

Especially if the alternative is State Care since no other relatives suitable or available?? MOO
 
So what would happen if no mushroom toxin is found in any of the deceased or Mr Wilkinson, or the dehydrator ?

I imagine ER would still be a suspect because she provided the meal.
That is an interesting question. I would have to start again from the beginning. I think we need a cause of death before we can make guesses about motives or draw inferences about guilty knowledge.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
141
Guests online
2,115
Total visitors
2,256

Forum statistics

Threads
600,260
Messages
18,106,096
Members
230,993
Latest member
Clue Keeper
Back
Top