Apparently the housemate reported Carly to have been wearing the yellow top, jeans and sandals on the day she went missing but then the current bf produced that photo, apparently taken of Carly during the trip over to the exs, wearing something contrary, a white/black striped singlet. When questioned about the striped singlet in the pic the bf amended the story by claiming Carly changed into the yellow top before she arrived at ex's place. If this were the case it would suggest Carly left her housemate that day in yellow top, was for some reason wearing striped top during trip to ex's when said photo was taken, then reamearged from car upon arrival in the yellow top again. All these discrepancies could be attributed to some confusion or for example, the housemate having been briefed by the current bf on what Carly was apparently wearing that day. However I think the important question is why the current bf would seek to produce a photo apparently documenting this trip to the ex's when it would seem logical the pic was infact taken on a different day? Is it possible Carly never even made it to the ex's? I believe it was confirmed that she did indeed visit that day and it certainly seems Carly had made plans to visit her daughter.....but I didn't think we'd actually heard anything from the ex. Regardless, it's just so strange that the current bf would produce this photo that contradicts everything reported and casts so much doubt on his version of events. I just wonder why he wanted to verify that trip if infact the events surrounding the clothes aren't as he described.