I am absolutely shocked! that is quite incredible! So you believe the Police have misrepresented the witness statements and released a evidence to the media that doesn't align with any of the real facts in the case. It would not surprise me one bit if it were true. That is absolutely ridiculous if found to be correct.
The Police believe your mate saw CG lean towards the vehicle, implying she stopped and spoke with the vehicle occupants. You are saying your friend only saw the back tail lights creeping towards her direction as she walked passed the vehicle in the distance. You have also said the vehicle did not drive passed you and your group and you noticed all 4 cars, none being the white Commodore Station wagon. That means the vehicle was somehow parked up in the distance? That seems odd? or did it pull out from a driveway?
If WAPOL have completely misinterpreted the witness testimonies and after the 50 million different detectives have had there go trying to work the case I do wonder if any of them ever went back to the original source and verified the witness statements still being used in 2016, or back then in 2008 when the CIA documentary was released.
This case is a shambles. Lets hope Frankie is genuine and he isnt making this up because if he is genuine WAPOL have again disgraced themselves in the case, and CG could quite easily have been abducted further down the road, or after the vehicle had passed her.
Why did WAPOL try and imply early in the investigation that the victims were picked up from a TAXI, or someone who knew the victims, or some type of trust worthy vehicle ( with the exception being a Police car of course which they ruled out very early), Did this evidence just try and fit in with that theory? Or was it fabricated to help convict Lance Williams who was known to stop and talk to his would be passengers before they entered the vehicle? I do wonder during that corrupt Police era whether this was fabricated to help push the Lance Williams angle...
What a shame this investigation just seems so tainted with incompetence, I hav always how much evidence they had that could have been released that would have helped the public narrow down a potential POI/Suspect and maybe a conviction that has been blown by total Police secrecy for no real reason. Why did they declare 'serial killer' before the last victim was taken? They didn't know of Karrakatta being linked at that stage, and if they did does that mean she should have been 'dead' not just 'left for dead'? Hence why they thought they had a 'serial killer' at hand?
The case really does seem like a complete miss-opportunity given WAPOL's woeful record solving major crimes and missing person cases around the state, it could have been a real opportunity to highlight just how far they had evolved, instead the whole thing has been wasted and squandered with corruption, secrecy and incompetence. The reviews have been farcical and no where near independent, and they narrowed their focus first towards taxi's and Mayors and then to Lonely men obsessed with handjobs, this with the help of our most incompetent corrupt detective Caporn, who gets given a nice cushy job for being the epitome of ineptness.
Maybe they should just throw everything out there, at this point you could hardly think there is anything to lose...