He spoke outside the AH police station( first appeal). He had no accent whatsoever. I'm inclined to think he came out to Aust as a child.Just curious where you have heard him speak. He hasn't said much at all to the media.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He spoke outside the AH police station( first appeal). He had no accent whatsoever. I'm inclined to think he came out to Aust as a child.Just curious where you have heard him speak. He hasn't said much at all to the media.
He blinks a lot though....imo
From experience, you don't always get back what you went in with or contributed along the way. :maddening:
Everone agrees the murder was unplanned (you dont plan to leave the body between 2 logs), that means money wasn't an issue or motive.
With good planning body should never be found and you wouldn't dump it near your brothers property or racehourse
Quite possibly she told him about leaving marriage and he couldn't take it, got mad and strangled or suffocated her, hence no visible injuries.
Im pretty sure in divorce process each party gets 50%, in this case one party is gone, so i guess spouse thats alive getes everything.
Don't think will can override that
Hypothetically, if now BR dies as well, everything would go to children, SR and AR are the only children i assume.
Sent from my SM-T350 using Tapatalk
He spoke outside the AH police station( first appeal). He had no accent whatsoever. I'm inclined to think he came out to Aust as a child.
In my experience....In the divorce process it is not mandated that everything is split 50/50. It is a 4 step process. 1. What each party brought to the table before getting together. 2. What each party contributed to the marriage during the marriage + length of marriage. 3. Children. 4. Future needs (of children/non working mother usually). Its work like a scale add some, take some and see what you end up with. Rarely is it 50/50.
Nope, just judging by the way i heard him speak English. I know a lot of maco people so i know sort of accent they have based on length of time in Oz. He would be in his early teens(max) when he arrived.
Maco people ?? Personally I find that offensive. I don't believe any fellow Websleuth member would lower themselves to making a comment like yours. Having the pleasure of working and meeting wonderful folk of numerous countries, religion, cultural differences. Thank you SA as a reminder to cultural tradition.
Sent from my SM-T350 using Tapatalk
BR sounds good in the that short video, there must be longer video i watched last week .
Sent from my HTC_M10h using Tapatalk
Specialtalk72In my experience....In the divorce process it is not mandated that everything is split 50/50. It is a 4 step process. 1. What each party brought to the table before getting together. 2. What each party contributed to the marriage during the marriage + length of marriage. 3. Children. 4. Future needs (of children/non working mother usually). Its work like a scale add some, take some and see what you end up with. Rarely is it 50/50.
Ok - so those of us that have been through it have no idea. Ok, I believe you even though I've done it twice - in AustraliaSpecialtalk72
Which country you in?
In western countries i dont think they care who brought what to the table before getting together, otherwise millionaires would not have to worry about marrying poor girl with nothing to contribute, only if you sign prenup that protects your assets acquired before you got into marriage contract.
The*Family Law Act 1975*sets out the general principles the court considers when deciding financial disputes after the breakdown of a marriage
The general principles are the same, regardless of whether the parties were in a marriage or a de facto relationship, and are based on:
working out what you've got and what you owe, that is your assets and debts and what they are worth
looking at the direct financial contributions by each party to the marriage or de facto relationship such as wage and salary earnings
looking at indirect financial contributions by each party such as gifts and inheritances from families
looking at the non-financial contributions to the marriage or de facto relationship such as caring for children and homemaking, and
future requirements a court will take into account things like age, health, financial resources, care of children and ability to earn.
Sent from my HTC_M10h using Tapatalk
Oh yes indeed sleep, I'm hearing you.
And seems quite preoccupied with the thought that others may think that he had financial difficulties.
OT :
http://www.9news.com.au/national/2017/02/28/15/02/qld-mum-missing-after-school-drop-off
Young mother from Calliope near Gladstone missing since yesterday morning.
[h=1]Update: missing woman, Calliope[/h] QPS Media on Feb 28, 2017 @ 7:22pm
Police have located the body believed to be that of a woman reported missing from Calliope.
There are no suspicious circumstances.
A report will be prepared for the Coroner.
For help, members of the public are encouraged to contact Lifeline on 13 1114 or visit www.lifeline.com.au or Beyond Blue on 1300 22 46 36 or at www.beyondblue.com.au
http://mypolice.qld.gov.au/blog/2017/02/28/update-missing-woman-calliope/
Can anyone clarify if Karen's body was placed between the fork of a tree, or between two logs or "under a log" as some news sources have reported?
It is hard to imagine that tree trunks of that size could be moved by one person.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
(snipped)But was it dumb luck that the murderer had just stumbled on that forked tree - if that is what it is? A great hiding spot (for them). Or did they already know it was there because they had wandered through that area before? Were perhaps familiar with the spot, as many experts say a murderer will do ... take their victim to a place they have been familiar with.
That is what I have wondered. Because it seems very convenient, to find a place like that when you are presumably in a hurry and an anxious state of mind.