PinkPower
Former Member
- Joined
- Dec 29, 2018
- Messages
- 279
- Reaction score
- 2,193
9.37am - Last photo on deck
No Cookies | The Advertiser
Do you know if that time stamp is substantiated?
9.37am - Last photo on deck
No Cookies | The Advertiser
Would Hornsby court be the court location for Avos for Kendall?
I’m curious because on nov 23 -Hornsby- AVO mentions… I can see a homicide dets name listed there (but a different first name to the other that was removed) the person this AVO against is specifically linked with
I saw the original AVO's there on Monday but they have since been removed.... unless you have found something different?Would Hornsby court be the court location for Avos for Kendall?
I’m curious because on nov 23 -Hornsby- AVO mentions… I can see a homicide dets name listed there (but a different first name to the other that was removed) the person this AVO against is specifically linked with
Would Hornsby court be the court location for Avos for Kendall?
I’m curious because on nov 23 -Hornsby- AVO mentions… I can see a homicide dets name listed there (but a different first name to the other that was removed) the person this AVO against is specifically linked with
And some kids are heavy sleepers at that young age. I don't think it's that unusual to put pull-ups on a 3 or even a 5 yr old. JMO
Given they have both been charged with assault, my mind is now imagining that the daughter, after being triggered by CS's case in WA, may have confronted the FP which resulted in a bad reaction from the parents.
It is also possible the alleged assault was picked up on 'bugging'
9.37am - Last photo on deck
Looking at the list, it seems that Hornsby almost handles nothing else other than AVOs. I 'm amazed at the number of them.
The photo bugs me because I think there is 5 people there when the photo was taken. FG, W & L, who can all be seen in the photo, person who is taking the photo and the person that WT is looking at in the photo.
Whether the FM & FF are guilty of doing anything to William or not, they were today charged with both assaulting an 11 year old child.
No matter how you cut it, they look like pretty terrible people if the alleged assault is found to be true.
And IMO, to add to that, homicide detectives are not going to take out AVO's / Charge people in an unrelated assault case (especially given their wealth, legal representation and perceived 'victim status' for losing William) unless they have something pretty damn good.
Has that time been absolutely verified? I know there was debate about it but I don't know if police accept it as 100% unquestionable.
I heard the FM explain during an interview that WT was looking up at her in the photo, whilst she was simultaneously bending down taking it.
IMO, this explanation is mind-boggling and quite frankly, insulting.
I heard the FM explain during an interview that WT was looking up at her in the photo, whilst she was simultaneously bending down taking it.
IMO, this explanation is mind-boggling and quite frankly, insulting.
I can't believe that they could even get through the many that are listed on a single day
Has that time been absolutely verified? I know there was debate about it but I don't know if police accept it as 100% unquestionable.
You don’t need much to take out an AVO/lay charges for common assault. An accusation and what? Some sort of evidence something physically happened. If not eyewitness than a bruise or a mark or scratch that could be completely unrelated.
It seems like a bit of an odd scenario for two adults to get physical with a child at the very same time. Don’t you think?
Common assault seems so vague. I guess we’ll see what comes out in the wash at court.
It is often hard to get a valid polygraph on grieving, upset parents of a missing child. JMOPolice should have asked the foster parents to sit polygraph tests. Granted they are not admissible in court but they do give investigating police a pretty good idea of where they should be focusing their attention. And refusal to sit a test gives police yet another perspective on potential suspects.