Seattle1
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 25, 2013
- Messages
- 40,716
- Reaction score
- 423,744
I guess I don't quite understand why GLENDALE PD was the team that selected the photos and had them researched to estimate victim ages, was Montana too busy or did not have the resources? Images age wise do not appear to be AN so I don't see the AZ link to the evidence other than they saw him toss the phone?
No, that's not how this went down:
1) The initial warrant leading to the search of the MT apartment and seizure of the phone/electronics with criminal data originated in AZ, not MT.
2) Glendale, AZ Detective Sydney Sutter is a Witness to the Hill County, MT, Information filed by the Asst AG of Montana. Glendale, PD selected the ten images to receive a sexual maturity rating because it's their protocol to do so.
3) Agent Brian Cassidy represents MT's Division of Criminal Investigation (DCI), and is also a named Witness to the State Information and charges.
4) Glendale PD contacted MT Agent Cassidy concerning the images AZ found on the phone belonging to Davis and transferred the electronics to Montana's DCI Computer Forensics Unit where Agent Cassidy obtained a search warrant to search for the illegal materials leading to the charges filed in Montana.
From the AA:
![1698182094474.png 1698182094474.png](https://www.websleuths.com/forums/data/attachments/428/428468-d539f04a1cc42b3e359b69f27883118d.jpg)