mamamia54
Inactive
LOL. I just posted that to you ^^^^^. Doesn't say "outward". NM
Then that's all you had to say.
LOL. I just posted that to you ^^^^^. Doesn't say "outward". NM
Clear up a few things here: 1) drunken voicemail...(pdf 4 page 63) it's unclear what was said or by who but the guess is SC ... just wonder do some prehistoric records checks and see if something happened to one of his sisters as a kid. 2) tunnels under the mall are not the tunnels i'm speaking of... im talking about the tunnel system NMcD was comming from southeast of Wilshire park ( pdf#3 pg 17 ) 3) the texas lady pdf #4 pg 65
Three sources:
Today Show
JVM
NG
Back up to previous thread and you will see the links.
Been there done that. Never read, heard or saw anyone say RC or SC had had any inconsistent statements other than goofy comments under articles. Will go check again and google more. Thanks.
Point taken- tyI really have no posts where I use "you".
I am simply a stickler for things stated as facts, and so I notice when a post states
"LE said" or "LE stated."
I would not want not offer clarification by any means if the post said "my take"
I like to see others' takes, but it would help for me to see that this is others' takes rather than what "LE said."
HTH!
Good grief, been here, done that, too. This was Matt Lauer on the Today Show.
Good grief, been here, done that, too. This was Matt Lauer on the Today Show.
Luminol reaction in Toyota - PG 58
http://www.tucsonnewsnow.com/link/563522/pdf-celis-1-blood-on-seat-testimony-from-neighbor
Then that's all you had to say.
Ok, stupid question alert: What does Luminol react to besides blood?
K, but Matt Lauer is not TPD and I really don't care what he thinks. Maybe that's just me? I don't care what Katie Couric thinks either to be fair or any TH on TV. :seeya:
I'm gonna call my POI from PDF#3 Page 17 of 91 NMcD from here out but there was other things pertaining to NMcD I found issue with other than just abruptly needing to go eat what he reffered to as "Breakfast" at approx 10:40am and jetting off in his car. There is another instance on an officers entry exit log where his is a passenger in a vehicle and his ID information was not recorded on the Log sheet. There are other mentions of him in the documents.. I should try to find the rest but I do beleave there was also a mention of him or at least his residence in PDF 5 where he was not home durring a canvas. I was able to research the storm drain, washes and other tunnels using http://maps.tucsonaz.gov/stormwater/ and selecting washes, storm drains etc from the table of contents on the side tab.. when you click on the tunnel of interest it pulls up the specifics such as the size, year built etc. but I also researched the documents and found that these tunnels were NOT searched only the tunnels under the mall were gone thru. The wash which runs past the tunnel system however was walked thru but nowhere could I find that the tunnel was gone thru. After looking at all I had looked thru and researched about this individual and these tunnels I did submit a TIP to TPD thru the TPD website.
From what I remember, the docs said the electric box prints were discovered around 11:00. Isn't it possible that there were several neighbors running around the alley (and the street) trying to help search before TPD arrived?
If someone was trying to get high enough to be able to scan over fences, couldn't they have stepped up to get a better look?
IMO if someone was actually washing dishes and cleaning up the kitchen, it sounds like a pretty chaotic crime scene.
Uhmm, these weren't "editorials", they were newscasts.
Please, just put it out of your mind. Really, no worries. The guy never made "inconsistent statements."
I have to say if I were sitting on a Grand Jury to implicate family involvement at this time I would vote NO because there now in my eyes is the possibility of a non-related party being involved.