mamamia54
Inactive
I thought we weren't permitted to talk about Nancy Grace in a negative way. Perhaps I misunderstood. I think all the negative talk about MSM people will send people that would like to post here away. MOO
Did anyone make any sense of the rambling man commentary in pdf # 4 pg 69 ... I really wonder what the deal with that was... was it the rambling of a visionary or psycic or just some mumbling drunk... what I found rather interesting was his mention of McDonald coming to mind.
IMO also... I don't trust a word she say's having knowledge of WHY she isn't a prosecutor anymore. She was let go for Prosecutorial misconduct... see Nancy Grace - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia plus she got her education in Valdosta GA so that makes me trust her even less not to mention she's a Macon resident... lol if you ever been around that area... them folks will pull you over break your tail light for you then issue a ticket.
Did anyone make any sense of the rambling man commentary in pdf # 4 pg 69 ... I really wonder what the deal with that was... was it the rambling of a visionary or psycic or just some mumbling drunk... what I found rather interesting was his mention of McDonald coming to mind.
Goodnight all!
Goodnight all!
Makes absolutely no sense to me.:nuts:
http://www.docstoc.com/docs/121433402/Isabel-Celis-Packet-4
Page 69
I thought we weren't permitted to talk about Nancy Grace in a negative way. Perhaps I misunderstood. I think all the negative talk about MSM people will send people that would like to post here away. MOO
That's crack at work :floorlaugh:
"I went to [redacted] room and saw the window open and the screen was crunched in and was to the side of the window on the floor outside."
We can't really deduce much from this description. The writer indicates that the screen was "crunched in" but never gives us a definitive perspective. Was the writer looking at the screen as they peered out the window, did the writer go outside and see the screen, or was the writing only indicating that the screen was "crunched in" upon itself. Did they determine how the screen should have been installed and then written with authority that it was, indeed, "crunched" towards the inside of the house from the outside ~ or the exact opposite?
From this meager description we can't really have any way to tell. But I'm sure LE knows exactly. And that, imo, is a great example of how confusing this doc dump can be.
We are now privy to more information but with no follow up of real facts and results of their further investigation. :dunno:
Been there done that. Never read, heard or saw anyone say RC or SC had had any inconsistent statements other than goofy comments under articles. Will go check again and google more. Thanks.
LE never said that, IMO