Also maybe the reason they didn't report her missing from the park is because neither of them knew she was missing until the next morning, and didn't want to be charged with negligence or risk the other kids being taken away. Each parent thought the other had her.
He says at a "PARK".http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/headlin...r-old-girl-vanishes-from-tucson-arizona-home/
watch this video again. at 1:00, the reporter interviews a teenager ("a family friend" they say) who says "she was just a perfect little girl having fun at a party".
at a party??? what party? now...none of the adults in that house (including the uncle, if he indeed lives there) are strangers to drinking (each, SC/RC/JM have a dui on their record)...
what if...there was a party going on at the celis home when they arrived from the baseball game (or they threw a party when they got home from the baseball game)...and no one really remembers who put her to bed when? and someone at the party was the guilty party? or...an accident/something illegal happened during or after needing a cover-up???
thoughts?
Mom leaves the park. Goes home and to bed. Dad gets home later (possibly with the boys) and goes to bed without looking in on Isabel. Mom gets up and goes to work without checking Isabel and risking waking her. Dad wakes up at 8 and goes to wake Isabel. She is not there. He calls 911 and begins to search for her. He calls his wife and she races home. It is until several hours have passed that the "I thought YOU brought her home last night" conversation takes place and by then the search is going on and they feel they can't tell the police what they have only just figured out. OR they do tell police which is why they want video from the ballfield the evening before.
http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/headlin...r-old-girl-vanishes-from-tucson-arizona-home/
watch this video again. at 1:00, the reporter interviews a teenager ("a family friend" they say) who says "she was just a perfect little girl having fun at a party".
at a party??? what party? now...none of the adults in that house (including the uncle, if he indeed lives there) are strangers to drinking (each, SC/RC/JM have a dui on their record)...
what if...there was a party going on at the celis home when they arrived from the baseball game (or they threw a party when they got home from the baseball game)...and no one really remembers who put her to bed when? and someone at the party was the guilty party? or...an accident/something illegal happened during or after needing a cover-up???
thoughts?
http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/headlin...r-old-girl-vanishes-from-tucson-arizona-home/
watch this video again. at 1:00, the reporter interviews a teenager ("a family friend" they say) who says "she was just a perfect little girl having fun at a party".
at a party??? what party? now...none of the adults in that house (including the uncle, if he indeed lives there) are strangers to drinking (each, SC/RC/JM have a dui on their record)...
what if...there was a party going on at the celis home when they arrived from the baseball game (or they threw a party when they got home from the baseball game)...and no one really remembers who put her to bed when? and someone at the party was the guilty party? or...an accident/something illegal happened during or after needing a cover-up???
thoughts?
Mom leaves the park. Goes home and to bed. Dad gets home later (possibly with the boys) and goes to bed without looking in on Isabel. Mom gets up and goes to work without checking Isabel and risking waking her. Dad wakes up at 8 and goes to wake Isabel. She is not there. He calls 911 and begins to search for her. He calls his wife and she races home. It is until several hours have passed that the "I thought YOU brought her home last night" conversation takes place and by then the search is going on and they feel they can't tell the police what they have only just figured out. OR they do tell police which is why they want video from the ballfield the evening before.
I really don't see this as so far out there, Mom tells dad, Isa is riding with him, dad is like some people and hears her but doesn't "hear her" or comprehend what she said. Mom is in bed when he gets home because of work the next morning, she is in a hurry when getting ready for work and doesn't check on Isa or looks in her room and assumes she is in her brothers room sleeping, dad gets up and then remembers what mom had said then starts the cover up.
As I understand it, she lives in the neighbor's guest house. She is not the homeowner. I would like to know how long she has been there. If it is a couple weeks, she really isn't in a position to say she is the ONLY one who walks there. If she has been there a couple of YEARS, it would be more meaningful.
The boys may be clueless, too. They probably want to believe their parents. Or maybe they just want to help out their parents and not expose their mistake AND kthey want to find Isa.
And maybe Isa was taken at the park before she had a chance to be wandering around without a parent...... after mom left the park, but before dad left the park.
Just a thought!
Well at the vigil her brothers team members ran out on the field that we had tied ribbons to before the game. From people talking there, the team that played after the vigil had started was her brothers team.
But either way, it has been stated in a couple of articles now that the family was at freedom park friday night.
But what about the 10 and 14 yr old? Would they go along with a horrible, corrupt cover up?
Also, the dad would have to assume that she was dead and not coming home. If they really had left her behind, wouldn't some of the other families have seen her, wandering out looking for her parents?
Is there some new fact that has emerged to give validation to any theory that puts Isa missing from the ballpark, rather than from her own bedroom in the middle of the night?? Or is this just more assumptions based on opinions?
I'm going to agree with the poster upthread. If one bases a theory on assumptions on top of other assumptions, then it's probably not a good theory. Many, many things are possible but that does not make them probable.
Is there some new fact that has emerged to give validation to any theory that puts Isa missing from the ballpark, rather than from her own bedroom in the middle of the night?? Or is this just more assumptions based on opinions?
I'm going to agree with the poster upthread. If one bases a theory on assumptions on top of other assumptions, then it's probably not a good theory. Many, many things are possible but that does not make them probable.
At the presser today, LE expressed lots of interest in getting photos/video from the ballpark that night. Which is what led to the speculation that she either did not leave the ballpark, or they are looking for a POI in the footage.
ooooh. Then you are suggesting that dad did not tell mom the truth when he realized it (at least not immediately)... he staged a break-in, called police and started the search. She came home, and would have had a "genuine" reaction to the news of her daughter's disappearance, and not until the police asked what she was last seen wearing (pants and shirt) that she figured out what had happened.
JMO
Not if someone took her first, they wouldn't notice, what if the boys assumed the same as mom did, she rode with dad, he put her to bed when they got home, and the dad is the only one who knows. Besides the person who took her from the park while dad was cleaning.
But why would the dad 'cover up', lie to police that she was taken from her bedroom, etc.? I would think if a parent realized they had left their child somewhere, they'd be rushing to that place and calling the police to help look for her there..