What do you think about the being told that the bones were in the debris and the debris were not even in the pit? Also what is your opinion of the screwdriver under the supposed tire belts she was burned in. The screwdriver unscathed by the fire. The bone that was 8 feet south? the bones in the quarry and the barrel that was on another persons property? All the dried leaves in the area too. It just seems like the stuff they photographed was the stuff they did good at planting. The blood the key. But when they dumped those bones from the quarry into his burn pit late at night they aimed for the debris, think that would make sense she be tangled in with that. When they actually found out that the stuff was not in the burn pit they deviated from procedure. Less likely for the jury to find reasonable doubt. They knew that all their planted evidence wasnt adding up but who better to cover up that crime then the departments doing the planting. This of course is all my opinion. Also find it strange that they waited so long to look at that burn pit and remove the dog, when the initial search warrant was only for 48 hours. The aggressive dog I have seen in pictures was either standing there sticking out his tongue, or laying down. I don't even see pictures of this so called aggressive dog. The dog that BJ also tried to pick up early on in the week. The 5th or 6th of November 2005. Seems the states theory and planted evidence was so full of holes that to prove this mans guilt they deviated from several procedures and protocols.
And what was it Gahn said about deviations and protocols in the news conference about the contaminated bullet fragment, the bullet the defense was not allowed to witness the testing, but a group of students did. He said...
"If you want to be rigid, and say that protocol is the protocol and you can never deviate from this whatsoever, I don't think most people believe thats how life operates. THAT SOMETIMES YOU DO HAVE TO DEVIATE JUST TO MAKE SENSE."
And in this case to make sense of it all they deviated from more than just one protocol. And when you are asking a jury to put a man in prison for life that those deviations from protocol should not be used. They needed to deviate to make sense, to give the jury the deviated truth of what really happened to TH, so they could get a guilty verdict, not the truth. JMO