LietKynes
Former Member
- Joined
- Aug 13, 2011
- Messages
- 10,770
- Reaction score
- 92,096
Ita.Agree. Assuming she was there.
A 'loaded' post, if there ever was one.
We have been going over and over RT's words.
Trying to be respectful to him and struggling to believe a story that wobbles when under scrutiny.
Every detail of that day should have been burned into his mind.
For starters, he has not revealed even the type of shoes/boots.
There are a myriad of hiking footwear styles.
If she was lost and became disoriented and her boot fell off -- anyone who found it wouldn't know this was Barbara's boot.
A red hat or a white hat ?
What beer container-- a can of Bud or a Yeti cooler ?
He said maybe someone took her --did they carefully make sure she dropped nothing, hat or drink ?
On and on, ad nauseam.
BBMAccording to the VI insider LE verified that she was there based on pictures of her taken there on that day.
Why would they say that if it wasn't true?
Re. the bolded -- Agreed.
There is a possibility that LE had their reasons.
Maybe they're building a case ?
It'd be nice if they dropped a few hints-- but LE aren't known to do that if they don't want to 'spook' someone.
If there's a chance she wasn't there --could the photos have been taken on a different day--- and the time stamp changed ?
Would LE know this instantly but keep silent about it while they look into other aspects of RT's life ?
This is standard protocol to look closely at the last person to have seen her .
Nothing unusual about it.