bodester413
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 13, 2015
- Messages
- 140
- Reaction score
- 320
I think the angle of the mug shot does not allow for a good comparison at ALL
True. The camera was lower in his mugshot.
I think the angle of the mug shot does not allow for a good comparison at ALL
I think the angle of the mug shot does not allow for a good comparison at ALL
http://www.sacbee.com/news/local/news-columns-blogs/marcos-breton/article85174522.html
During the initial investigation, the crimes caused local cops to become suspects themselves. The rapist had to be a cop, some felt, because he seemed to know exactly what the cops were doing.
He was strong, methodical, athletic and elusive. He exhibited military precision in the way he tied victims up quickly and efficiently.
A 1993 Sacramento Bee story detailed how even the lead investigators in the case had to provide saliva samples because the public had begun to believe that a rogue cop was committing these crimes while being protected by his fellow officers.
Any of us would have turned in our own son, we wanted this guy so bad, said Richard Shelby in the 1993 Bee article that marked his retirement from the Sacramento County Sheriffs Department.
We had set up traps on the phones of victims, and he called the one who didnt have a trap on her phone, said Carol Daly, who retired as Sacramento County undersheriff in 2001, and was one of the original investigators on the case.
A great chance to clear up yet another urban legend or myth. Doctors trained to identify signs of sexual abuse/rape in young girls/adolescents will tell you definitively that each person's hymen is different and some females don't ever have one that is detectable. Where there is a visible hymen, in some individuals it can remain undamaged even after penetration. Bottom Line - the condition of a person's hymen or lack thereof means nothing with regard to whether sexual intercourse or penetration has occurred.
So how did he know that stuff? He wasn’t actually working the case, right?
I believe there was only one attempted rape abduction in the Visalia crimes... that one attempt failed and ended up with the death of the girls father. Visalia for the most part was just burglaries
DNA evidence was not used/collected in the mid 70's it's first use in court was the mid 80's
That would be good because if there is a match and a digit missing on one hand they could clear all those cases (although not prosecute them). He would have been fingerprinted for the shoplifting even if his prints were not retained as an ex LEO.
Am I reading this correctly? He suffers from vertigo and has a boat? I'll retract my initial suggestion of Mèniére's Disease because we don't do boats well. Not in our 60s at least
https://www.noozhawk.com/article/pu...olden_state_killer_suspect_to_goleta_slayings
“The Santa Barbara County Sheriff’s Office is asking for the public’s help in establishing a timeline for the ongoing investigation involving the murders,” said Kelly Hoover, a sheriff’s spokeswoman.
The suspect was believed to be in Santa Barbara County between 1978 and 1986, Hoover said.
“If you believe you saw him anywhere in Santa Barbara County, or personally know him, please contact the Sheriff’s Criminal Investigations Bureau at 805.681.4150, or go to the sheriff’s website at http://www.sbsheriff.org/anonymoustips.html
quoting myself..Have we been able to place him anywhere from 1978-1986 for job or living arrangements?
Just because he used it as an excuse to be absent from work, doesn't mean he actually suffered from it. It is a lot less likely for his supervisor to disprove than the flu or a sore throat, much easier to fake.It's speculation that he suffers from vertigo.
It hasn't been reported in any MSM source as fact.
The fact that GSK called the victim who did not have a trap on her phone makes me wonder if he knew which phone did not have the phone trap because of his position in LE?
I think it was transferred to a trust. Must have been part of their separation.Not from what I've seen, at least as of yet. The Auburn Journal (CA) online addition (paid subscription) dated Sept. 26, 1979, states that Joseph DeAngelo was fired from the Auburn Police Department last month.
I would think his wife might have some information about where he was working (if he was working) after he was fired from the police department and she might also have an idea of where he was living during that time-frame as well. But then again, maybe he just disappeared and she has no clue. At this point, nothing about him would surprise me.
Through the Sacramento Co. Assessor's website, I did find there was an ownership transfer on the Canyon Oaks Drive house in Citrus Heights, CA on December 2, 1993, but the site doesn't provide any other information on that.
So how did he know that stuff? He wasnt actually working the case, right?