GUILTY CA - Erin Corwin, 19, pregnant, Twentynine Palms, 28 June 2014 - #12

Welcome to Websleuths!
Click to learn how to make a missing person's thread

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Status
Not open for further replies.
Did Erin know that her furniture would not arrive for weeks, when she flew out? Wondering why she would want to arrive so much ahead of it, not that it matters. I guess she would want to acclimate, but I would be anxious to set up my new married home. Waiting would drive me nuts. JMO
 
Did Erin know that her furniture would not arrive for weeks, when she flew out? Wondering why she would want to arrive so much ahead of it, not that it matters. I guess she would want to acclimate, but I would be anxious to set up my new married home. Waiting would drive me nuts. JMO

I remember waiting weeks to get our household goods, whether it was moving from one stateside Army post to another stateside Army post,
or being stationed in Germany and waiting for the household goods to arrive and the car to arrive at the port.
I remember eating off a turned over cardboard box,(stateside), as a make shift table, and couldn't wait until we got our furniture and belongings delivered.
I think it is part and parcel of being in the military, and although it did drive me nuts, that's how it was.
I would think Erin would have been anxious to sign for quarters and start her new home.
When we lived in Germany, we could sign for some Military pieces of furniture to use.
IMOO.
 
Did Erin know that her furniture would not arrive for weeks, when she flew out? Wondering why she would want to arrive so much ahead of it, not that it matters. I guess she would want to acclimate, but I would be anxious to set up my new married home. Waiting would drive me nuts. JMO

Yes she knew it would be a while before her furniture got there. She had a day that she had to be there to get her housing. She had to have the housing before her furniture got there.
 
Anyone look at NL's pinterest last hours? She seems to want peeps to know something.
 
Yes, and I'm still wondering what she meant. I don't speak 'code' or 'insinuation' too well.

She would like you to believe she is an innocent victim. Loud and clear. I have never seen anyone put the same pin up in that manner. It does not even apply to all those boards. She is aware people are watching. To me it demonstrates the same arrogance as "No body, no case"
 
She would like you to believe she is an innocent victim. Loud and clear. I have never seen anyone put the same pin up in that manner. It does not even apply to all those boards. She is aware people are watching. To me it demonstrates the same arrogance as "No body, no case"

I can see that....but I wondered exactly what she was trying to say.
Is she blaming her husband?
Is she claiming her husband has been set up?
Is she claiming that she has been set up?
Is she claiming that she & her husband have both been set up?

I'm not a behavioral specialist, but I hold 2 different positions that require me to read people.....but that is on a one-to-one basis in full view in question and answer sessions. Since I don't do 'code' or 'insinuation' in the written word too well, I tend to be very skeptical.
 
I don't know what she is trying to say. I guess it could be any of the things you listed. I do think that she is attempting to manipulate public opinion and that's JMO. I just want to continue to try and point out that we should be skeptical of anything she presents. I question her sincerity.
 
So I am almost caught up here, but I have a question. Did they ever release cause of death? And did the autopsy revel the pregnancy? Also what is up with NL? Is she "standing by her man"?
 
So I am almost caught up here, but I have a question. Did they ever release cause of death? And did the autopsy revel the pregnancy? Also what is up with NL? Is she "standing by her man"?

No cause of death, no word on pregnancy revealed.
 
I'm unable to shake off my suspicion that NL was indirectly/directly involved in the murder of Erin. There is something called 'normal behaviour' but so far I haven't seen an inkling of it from NL. In the very best case scenario, she wasn't involved at all but feels that Erin 'got what she deserved'. Saying 'no body, no crime' shows a great deal of apathy towards the victim. If I, as a normal human being, were in her situation I'd be crying day and night. And if I were to talk about the case then I'd say that I was really sorry for the victim and that my husband is innocent. 'Bodies, cases, crimes, Scott Peterson' Aye Yai Yai, that's not normal in my opinion. In the worst case scenario, she was involved right from the start.
Hmm, reminiscent of Adrianne Jones' murder.. "The Texas Cadet Murder" http://www.crimelibrary.com/notorious_murders/young/zamora/3.html
 
After rereading the pinterest post a few times, it sounds to me like she could possibly be referring to the laying in wait charge.
 
I think she is saying that she and/or CL have integrity and were honest with the cops, and as a result they got set up by the real killer. JMO.

http://www.pinterest.com/nmazing/pins/

This was how I read it the first time too - I wondered if I was the only one. I seriously don't understand Pinterest. Most of the time I can't tell what people are just "repinning" vs. stuff they're commenting on. With my admittedly limited knowledge I thought they were odd posts for boards about moms and horses for sure, and still a little odd for boards about husbands/wives/best friends.
 
I can see that....but I wondered exactly what she was trying to say.
Is she blaming her husband?
Is she claiming her husband has been set up?
Is she claiming that she has been set up?
Is she claiming that she & her husband have both been set up?

I'm not a behavioral specialist, but I hold 2 different positions that require me to read people.....but that is on a one-to-one basis in full view in question and answer sessions. Since I don't do 'code' or 'insinuation' in the written word too well, I tend to be very skeptical.

I think she is implying that she and her husband are 'so full of integrity' that they were easy to set up, or be framed for murder. :facepalm:

If anyone was 'easy to set up' it was poor Erin, imo. Like a moth to a flame. :rose:
 
And why hasn't she shown any compassion for her ex-friend who is dead, who was murdered, if she was framed, if her husband was framed???

I took it that she and her husband have integrity and that they were framed. By who? Erin??? She's the one who is dead. Who could have framed them, known about the affair, known Erin was pregnant and thought the baby might be CL's?

Sometimes I feel sorry for NL, other times, not so much. I'd feel a lot sorrier for her if she'd show some compassion towards Erin. IMO
 
And why hasn't she shown any compassion for her ex-friend who is dead, who was murdered, if she was framed, if her husband was framed???

I took it that she and her husband have integrity and that they were framed. By who? Erin??? She's the one who is dead. Who could have framed them, known about the affair, known Erin was pregnant and thought the baby might be CL's?

Sometimes I feel sorry for NL, other times, not so much. I'd feel a lot sorrier for her if she'd show some compassion towards Erin. IMO

I completely understand her not having any compassion for her husband's girlfriend. In fact, intense feelings of anger and even rage are completely normal. However, when the poor girl ends up dead in some mine somewhere, that has got to evoke some sympathy. Well, we can excuse away her seeming lack of sympathy for Erin. However, I really am unable to comprehend how Chris who was 'close' to Erin could lure, murder and dispose of her in such a cruel manner. It's shocking.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
119
Guests online
1,607
Total visitors
1,726

Forum statistics

Threads
606,255
Messages
18,201,115
Members
233,790
Latest member
Mrsmb
Back
Top