Did McGee forget to ask Sanchez about Susan telling her around Feb. 15-16, 2010 that she didn't believe the family was coming back?
For comparison to what SB testified: 49:00-53:00 of the Day 31 Part 1:
Sanchez wasn't there around Feb 15-16 2010.
There is a
lot of misinformation (I'm not talking about opinion) being posted in these threads recently which renders ensuing discussion pointless and misleading to posters who only read here and aren't listening to testimony, because it's not in line with the trial evidence. In the last couple of days (apart from this post) I've corrected posts misstating that -
(posts rsbm)
travelbug said:
Post #930 Thread 14: The issue I have with his reasons is that he took the computer before Dugal even came out to the house.
Much of this, including Merritt's interview, happened after the warrants were executed on the home though.
It's interesting to note that LE states that CM was the first to alert SB, in contrast to what has been stated since that time.
This has been something they have mentioned numerous times, that his DNA wasn't found on that side of the Trooper
With regard to the prosecution mentioning no DNA on the passenger side of the Trooper numerous times I'm not sure if this is a misrepresentation or not but I haven't seen examples and I stand to be corrected if there are any that I missed other than the prosecutor stating those were the state's results during the hearing for dismissal outside the jury's presence. Maybe he asked DuGal to confirm if that is what Merritt told him during his interview? IDK but I don't think it's numerous and I also don't think it would be relevant to the state's case because the paintball excuse isn't corroborated (yet).
Returning to smr's post, if you follow the cross-examination in Day 31 Part 2 Susan went to the house on the 16th with McGyver. I recall her testifying previously that she didn't have Summer's mother's number at that time and that was what she was looking for in the house because she didn't want Summer's family to find out from the media the family was missing.
At 1:50 to 2:15 in the day 31 part 2 video Susan testifies that she went to the house to clean, with Kathy Sanchez and Blanche, many months later, around
June 2010. Ms Sanchez testified the same yesterday - that it was spring/summer. Susan testified that the reason they went to clean was that the house was going into foreclosure.
So given the true facts and context, 4 months after the family vanished Susan may or may not have remarked that she felt they weren't coming back and it's hardly surprising (to me) that McGee would think that was relevant. He found out Sanchez wasn't there on Feb 16th during Susan's examination.
McGee tried ... it was objected to and sustained, later they went to sidebar and it was still sustained.
This isn't true. The sustained objection on relevancy grounds and evidence code 352 was a question McGee was going to ask Sanchez about what Susan may have said about her feelings about Summer, to Summer's cousin and mother.
I'm not posting this to be argumentative, I think it's important we keep to facts and so the discussion is relevant, whichever side of the fence anyone is on.
JMO