CA CA - Maya Millete, 39, missed daughter's birthday, Chula Vista, 7 Jan 2021 #4 *husband arrested*

[floridafreshsqueez]

Husband to missing Chula Vista mom says ‘I pose no threat’ as new documents unsealed


https://fox5sandiego.com/news/local-news/husband-to-missing-chula-vista-mom-says-i-pose-no-threat-as-new-documents-unsealed/


“In a pair of text messages to FOX 5 on Monday night, Larry Millete responded to the newly released documents. In the messages, he said the following:

I pose no threat. I am a law abiding American citizen who believe(s) in our 2nd amendment rights. My rights have been violated numerous times. The photo was from 2020 when I was taking inventory as most people do. The photos were taken from my laptop not my phone during the first search, illegally seized when they did not have a warrant for my electronic devices. My children are always safe, happy and healthy despite the situation. I am finding out how questionable the justice system can be and how it can easily be manipulated by authorities in order to violate your rights. GVRO created as a witch-hunt towards gun owners to disarm anyone even by hearsay by anyone who may not like you. Warrant less warrants created to violate our 4th amendment rights which enable authorities to invade your privacy and ransack our homes. Absolutely disappointing that this happens in our country. Despite all I have endured I still believe we live in the best country on earth. Very respectfully, Larry Millete.

Also none of my firearms are unregistered or illegal. All registered and serialized. I recently found out that they are able to hold vehicles indefinitely. They have taken all our electronics affecting my children’s education. They have taken my firearms, thousand of rounds of ammunition and gun parts without providing me with a detailed inventory on all the searches. The lists were all hand written and vague. They basically want me disarmed with no way of defending myself or my family. Again a basic American right.”

Larry Millete, texts to FOX 5 on July 26, 2021

LOL at “Despite all I have endured…” sooo nothing about what his children have endured and of course no acknowledgement of what Maya’s family is going through. His depravity knows no bounds, his audacity blows me away…

 

[cvaldez1975]

Husband to missing Chula Vista mom says ‘I pose no threat’ as new documents unsealed


Maya Millete disappearance: Larry Millete says 'I pose no threat' as new documents unsealed


“In a pair of text messages to FOX 5 on Monday night, Larry Millete responded to the newly released documents. In the messages, he said the following:

I pose no threat. I am a law abiding American citizen who believe(s) in our 2nd amendment rights. My rights have been violated numerous times. The photo was from 2020 when I was taking inventory as most people do. The photos were taken from my laptop not my phone during the first search, illegally seized when they did not have a warrant for my electronic devices. My children are always safe, happy and healthy despite the situation. I am finding out how questionable the justice system can be and how it can easily be manipulated by authorities in order to violate your rights. GVRO created as a witch-hunt towards gun owners to disarm anyone even by hearsay by anyone who may not like you. Warrant less warrants created to violate our 4th amendment rights which enable authorities to invade your privacy and ransack our homes. Absolutely disappointing that this happens in our country. Despite all I have endured I still believe we live in the best country on earth. Very respectfully, Larry Millete.

Also none of my firearms are unregistered or illegal. All registered and serialized. I recently found out that they are able to hold vehicles indefinitely. They have taken all our electronics affecting my children’s education. They have taken my firearms, thousand of rounds of ammunition and gun parts without providing me with a detailed inventory on all the searches. The lists were all hand written and vague. They basically want me disarmed with no way of defending myself or my family. Again a basic American right.”

Larry Millete, texts to FOX 5 on July 26, 2021

LOL at “Despite all I have endured…” sooo nothing about what his children have endured and of course no acknowledgement of what Maya’s family is going through. His depravity knows no bounds, his audacity blows me away…

so its that narrative eh.

 

[coastal]

so its that narrative eh.

I see that he didn't mention the two guns he purchased in February and March of 2021, after he was served with the GVRO (page 2, line 9):

https://interactive.cbs8.com/pdfs/Millete_GVRO_unsealed.pdf

I don't know if it's legal for someone to buy guns while under a GVRO, but it doesn't make him look any less dangerous or irresponsible to me. It makes him look like a hothead who doesn't respect any but his own twisted idea of "rights" and "freedom".

IMO, LM may be his own worst enemy. Aww.

 

[Seattle1]

I see that he didn't mention the two guns he purchased in February and March of 2021, after he was served with the GVRO (page 2, line 9):

https://interactive.cbs8.com/pdfs/Millete_GVRO_unsealed.pdf

I don't know if it's legal for someone to buy guns while under a GVRO, but it doesn't make him look any less dangerous or irresponsible to me. It makes him look like a hothead who doesn't respect any but his own twisted idea of "rights" and "freedom".

IMO, LM may be his own worst enemy. Aww.

Well said. I was thinking the same -- LM believes he can pick and choose which rules apply to him. MOO

 

[LindsayXO]

I don't live there so I'm not going to pretend to understand the US constitution but I have a feeling Larry doesn't understand it either.

I copied the following from Understanding Search-and-Seizure Law

The flip side is that the Fourth Amendment does permit searches and seizures that are reasonable. In practice, this means that the police may override your privacy concerns and conduct a search of you, your home, barn, car, boat, office, personal or business documents, bank account records, trash barrel, or whatever, if:

• probable cause to believe they can find evidence that you committed a crime, and a judge issues a warrant, or
• the particular circumstances justify the search without a warrant first being issued.

Maybe I'm wrong but I think probable cause might apply when;

1. Your wife disappears
2. Your wife disappears after an argument
3. Your wife disappears before an appointment with a divorce attorney
4. Your wife disappears before important life events that she planned, like her daughter's birthday
5. Your wife disappears the same day "mysterious bangs" are heard in or behind your residence
6. Your wife disappears after mentioning to family members "if anything happens to me, it would be Larry"

I could go on for hours. However, correct me if I'm wrong.

I'd also be interested to know if Larry considers his four year old son "inventory".

MOO

 

[rosesfromangels]

so its that narrative eh.

He needs to convince the D.A. and Judge of that...

Amateur opinion and speculation

 

[cvaldez1975]

I see that he didn't mention the two guns he purchased in February and March of 2021, after he was served with the GVRO (page 2, line 9):

https://interactive.cbs8.com/pdfs/Millete_GVRO_unsealed.pdf

I don't know if it's legal for someone to buy guns while under a GVRO, but it doesn't make him look any less dangerous or irresponsible to me. It makes him look like a hothead who doesn't respect any but his own twisted idea of "rights" and "freedom".

IMO, LM may be his own worst enemy. Aww.

exactly, its like thumbing his nose

 

[cvaldez1975]

Well said. I was thinking the same -- LM believes he can pick and choose which rules apply to him. MOO

narcissistic behavior.

 

[cvaldez1975]

I don't live there so I'm not going to pretend to understand the US constitution but I have a feeling Larry doesn't understand it either.

I copied the following from Understanding Search-and-Seizure Law

The flip side is that the Fourth Amendment does permit searches and seizures that are reasonable. In practice, this means that the police may override your privacy concerns and conduct a search of you, your home, barn, car, boat, office, personal or business documents, bank account records, trash barrel, or whatever, if:

• probable cause to believe they can find evidence that you committed a crime, and a judge issues a warrant, or
• the particular circumstances justify the search without a warrant first being issued.

Maybe I'm wrong but I think probable cause might apply when;

1. Your wife disappears
2. Your wife disappears after an argument
3. Your wife disappears before an appointment with a divorce attorney
4. Your wife disappears before important life events that she planned, like her daughter's birthday
5. Your wife disappears the same day "mysterious bangs" are heard in or behind your residence
6. Your wife disappears after mentioning to family members "if anything happens to me, it would be Larry"

I could go on for hours. However, correct me if I'm wrong.

I'd also be interested to know if Larry considers his four year old son "inventory".

MOO

narcissists do view their children as possessions so, possibly.

 

[Mitch1]

This guy is so self absorbed and arrogant -the kind that defends himself at his own 1st degree murder trial kind of arrogant!

 

[rosesfromangels]

The aunt and uncle are the key to solving this case.
They should either start cooperating with the D.A., or start getting their affairs in order in anticipation of a long stay in prison. It's their choice. It's not "if", it's when.

Amateur opinion and speculation

 

[swedeheart]

Interview with Maricris and Richard: (discussion starts around 9:53).

It is revealed by Maricris that Maya actually submitted the paperwork for divorce on the day she disappeared. She filled out the online forms and submitted them on Jan. 7. (Her physical meeting with the lawyer was the following Tuesday. She was waiting until after her daughter's birthday to go see the lawyer in person).

Was Larry tracking Maya's online presence, too? Certainly seems plausible with this info. We know he got in to her FB account and deleted photos and videos, and blocked family.

 

[rosesfromangels]

Interview with Maricris and Richard: (discussion starts around 9:53).

It is revealed by Maricris that Maya actually submitted the paperwork for divorce on the day she disappeared. She filled out the online forms and submitted them on Jan. 7. (Her physical meeting with the lawyer was the following Tuesday. She was waiting until after her daughter's birthday to go see the lawyer in person).

Was Larry tracking Maya's online presence, too? Certainly seems plausible with this info. We know he got in to her FB account and deleted photos and videos, and blocked family.

Whoa....that is *significant*. Given all that has been coming out about LM's various tracking activities, it wouldn't be a far stretch to surmise he saw this filing. Poor Maya.

Amateur opinion and speculation

 

[Seattle1]

Interview with Maricris and Richard: (discussion starts around 9:53).

It is revealed by Maricris that Maya actually submitted the paperwork for divorce on the day she disappeared. She filled out the online forms and submitted them on Jan. 7. (Her physical meeting with the lawyer was the following Tuesday. She was waiting until after her daughter's birthday to go see the lawyer in person).

Was Larry tracking Maya's online presence, too? Certainly seems plausible with this info. We know he got in to her FB account and deleted photos and videos, and blocked family.

I just listened to the update - thanks for posting @swedeheart.

Important to clarify that MM did not legally file for divorce on Jan 7.

To be clear, MM still had not even had a face-to-face meeting with her new lawyer. MM simply completed a new client organizer online and was scheduled to meet the attorney after the weekend birthday celebration.

This follows the typical process businesses were following under COVID19 restriction on that date.

I'm also glad that Mike King acted to clarify the earlier (mis)communication between Maricris and Court TV.

MOO

 

[leavetheguntakethecannoli]

Bumping for Maya

 

[BeachSky]

exactly, its like thumbing his nose

False bravado IMO
Why didn’t he just move on? She did.
Even in her missing, he blame shifted everything onto her
He’s a miserable shell of a person.
His house of cards are falling pretty fast now...

MOO

 

[cvaldez1975]

New documents in Maya Millete case detail police concerns about husband - Court TV

just more about gvro

 

[Niner]

I'll shorten this up a bit....

Tuesday, August 3rd:
*Family Mediation Conference Hearing (@ am PT) - CA - *Maya Millete (39) (last seen @ home on Jan. 7, 2021, near San Miguel Ranch area, Chula Vista & reported missing Jan. 9, 2021 by her sister). *Larry Millete (39) regarding gun violence restraining order on possession of guns.
Case info from 1/7/21 thru 6/30/21 reference post #364 here:
CA - CA - Maya Millete, 39, missed daughter's birthday, Chula Vista, 7 Jan 2021 #4
6/30/21 Update: Initial appearances were made during a June 30 hearing. The attorney representing Larry Millete had a conflict & could not appear in court. The judge continued the hearing until July 21 at 2:30 pm, when a decision is expected on unsealing the records. Judge Earl H. Maas, III said he would allow motions on behalf of SDPD & Larry Millete to be filed under seal, pending a final decision on making the case records public.
7/15/21 Update: A mandatory mediation conference with Family Court Services is scheduled for all parties in the case on 8/3/21. It remains to be seen whether Larry Millete will be served the court’s notice in advance of the mediation conference. During the 9/14/21 GVRO hearing the judge will decide whether to return the seized guns to Millete or to extend gun violence restraining order for up to a year.
7/21/21 Update: San Diego County Superior Court Judge Katherine A. Baclordered all records be made public, with the exception of the photo of the child surrounded by the guns, which will be redacted so the child cannot be identified.” A statement that San Diego County Child Welfare Services currently is investigating the safety of the Millete children, ages 4, 10 & 11. San Diego Deputy City Attorney Jeff Brooker in open court on Wednesday has named Millete a “person of interest" in the disappearance of his wife, Maya. "The minor children in the home had the combination & access to the safe where the firearms were stored," SDPD Detective Garlow wrote in an unsealed declaration.
7/28/21 Update: The Chula Vista Police Dept. is continuing its bi-weekly updates on the investigation into missing May 'Maya' Millete, six months after her disappearance. The update includes one more interview with individuals including, family members, friends, neighbors & witnesses has been conducted. Two more search warrants have been written & five more tips have been reviewed since the last update on July 14. The investigative steps and efforts to date are below: Interviews with 71 individuals to include family members, friends, neighbors & witnesses. Written 54 search warrants to include residences, vehicles, cellular & electronic devices, call detail records, financial records, social media & cloud data. A search warrant served at May’s home on 1/23/21. A search warrant served at a Millete relatives’ home on 4/1/21. A search warrant served at May’s home on 5/7/21. Gun violence restraining order (GVRO) served on 5/7/21 to Larry Millete. A search warrant served at May’s home on 7/1/21. Larry Millete was named “Person of Interest” in the case on 7/22/21. Police have reviewed over 115 tips on May’s possible location & reason for the disappearance. These tips have come from the local community & from around the country. Most recent tips continue to include possible sightings of May in different areas of the country. Based on investigative leads, law enforcement has also conducted searches in the area of east Chula Vista to include 500 Hunte Parkway.

 

[MichelleAntonia]

Watch the Video! Lots of details within the documents.
The children knew the combination to the gun safe, so that poses a danger to them and gives them access.

Unsealed records: Disappearance of Maya Millete a ‘criminal investigation’ | cbs8.com

"The minor children in the home had the combination and access to the safe where the firearms were stored," SDPD Detective Garlow wrote in an unsealed declaration.

I do not think that children being told where the guns are and having access to them is a cut and dry "bad" thing. As a kid growing up, I knew where the guns were. I was taught how to use them, and how to respect them, never to touch them unless absolutely necessary. And it turned out to be necessary, as a close call when I was 13 forced me to have to go get one during a really scary incident outside. If it had escalated and if I had needed to use that firearm (me and my sister were the only ones at home and would've been the only ones in the position to do anything)... if I had not had access, something truly bad would have happened to my dad.

This is not to say that anything in LM's case lines up or is legit. But I don't think certain conditions here are, as a rule, a problem. It's all his behavior put together that's really the issue.

 

[Curious Me]

I do not think that children being told where the guns are and having access to them is a cut and dry "bad" thing. As a kid growing up, I knew where the guns were. I was taught how to use them, and how to respect them, never to touch them unless absolutely necessary. And it turned out to be necessary, as a close call when I was 13 forced me to have to go get one during a really scary incident outside. If it had escalated and if I had needed to use that firearm (me and my sister were the only ones at home and would've been the only ones in the position to do anything)... if I had not had access, something truly bad would have happened to my dad.

This is not to say that anything in LM's case lines up or is legit. But I don't think certain conditions here are, as a rule, a problem. It's all his behavior put together that's really the issue.

Wow, it sounds like you were put in a position that required a great deal of wisdom and decision making on the spot for a 13 yr. old. You sounded in the know and ready, and trustworthy. I respect what you have to say.

I know many children are brought up in homes with firearms, around responsible gun owners (and often hunters) that teach the children the seriousness of firearms. However, not all adults can be trusted to teach their children correctly. Nor can all children be trusted to know about gun rules and safety, as we hear constantly on the news. Many kids want to show off their parent's gun, and others have no idea how to handle a gun.
Police: 12-Year-Old Chula Vista Boy Accidentally Killed Himself with Gun Brought by Friend - Times of San Diego
Most children don't need access to a gun safe, need to know the combination, or have a firearm handy, but that is just my own opinion. Also, there's some children with anger issues. So, it's not a one size fits all type of situation, as you probably agree. Guns are suppose to be locked up here, and not readily available to children.

That pic of all those firearms that don't look like "a quaint gun collection", but an arsenal of weapons... add all that ammunition, the passports, and then a little boy. MOO, it makes me nervous. An impressionable little boy who needs his mommy more than he needs a gun. It was an unnecessary pic to take, and it sends some type of wrong message, especially in light of this case. Gun shots being heard, a missing wife, LM acting like a fool spouting all his gun rights when the general public is worried sick over his children and his missing wife. Complete strangers search for Maya every week, and all LM seems worried about is his gun rights. That's how he comes across. He seems oblivious to how he appears to most of us-- starting with his phone interview early on and how he described his missing wife. He's oblivious to how he comes across to others. He makes me nervous and I'm not sure about his values. I'm worried for the children and their well-being and wish this waiting would be over.

This is all just my own opinion.