TTF14
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 3, 2014
- Messages
- 15,344
- Reaction score
- 71,062
And I think that by the end of the year, there will be a conclusion to this case.
And probably a divorce.
And I think that by the end of the year, there will be a conclusion to this case.
As I see it, everything about this news release was intended to ramp up pressure on the Papinis without actually saying that LE doubts their story. Without a confession and apparently no smoking gun has turned up, they can't outright say they don't believe the story. Too much liability. They believe they know what DIDN'T happen - they're just not sure yet what DID happen.
But there's a specific reason for everything they released. Why say they investigated Mich Man only to say he wasn't involved? They could have just left it out. The fact that they included it indicates to me that they think it's relevant; maybe the guy wasn't involved, but his imminent hook-up with Sherri was a stressor for her.
The sketches look rather comical, if you ask me. They don't validate her story, they kind of make a mockery of it.
The brawl in the bathroom, the gunshot and then one captor taking her to safety (who happened to be the one whose head Sherri supposedly slammed into the toilet) is movie stuff. Not real life. And they were careful to tell us that the cut foot didn't hold up.
The DNA is also at odds with her story. How would a man's DNA get on her clothes if she had no contact with men?
LE has been very shrewd with this release. And I think that by the end of the year, there will be a conclusion to this case.
BBM
They weren't her own clothes as I noted in links up thread. The gray sweats must have belonged to one of the women who likely had contact with a male. She went running in pink and was released in gray.
JMO
Or maybe the sweatpants and top were a male's clothing that she was wearing and had not been cleaned prior to her wearing them.BBM: About the clothes.
Read more here: http://www.sacbee.com/news/local/crime/article180824671.html#storylink=cpy
Those are not the clothes she went running in -
Read more here: http://www.sacbee.com/news/local/article114313103.html#storylink=cpy
So whatever went on she ended up in a gray sweat suit. So male DNA was found on the clothes and it wasn't her husband's but female DNA was found on her body.
Read more here: http://www.sacbee.com/news/local/crime/article180824671.html#storylink=cpy
Seems odd to say the least. Or could it be as simple as she ended up wearing these gray sweats that belonged to one of the women and the DNA is touch DNA - male on the outside and female on the inside as in a Male removed the clothing from the woman.
SP just happened to end up wearing it at some later time.
JMO
So the kidnappers are smart enough to cover their faces at all times,
So the kidnappers are smart enough to cover their faces at all times, yet dumb enough to give Sherri their own clothes instead of just buying something new for her at Wal-Mart?
Bravo said:Apparently. I think we are sitting on the same bench. Push over. We may need more room. LOL
Stripehaven said:snipped by me....
Interesting about the male DNA. Was "he" posing as a woman to confuse SP? So very many questions..
trenchmouth said:snipped by me...
Was she ever given a lie detector test?
Although its not related to SPs kidnapping, I was disturbed to read about the complaints family members made about her to LE between 2000-2003. Family doesnt usually get LE involved until actions become intolerable, so I assume these reports are the tip of the iceberg. It is not connected to the kidnapping years later, of course. But this is not normal behavior. I hope she got help and overcame whatever was going on at that time.
JMO
http://www.sacbee.com/news/local/crime/article180824671.html
I tried to upload but it says my pic has an incorrect file extension.... anyone know how to fix it?
I was thinking the clothes may have been purchased from a thrift store - I know they would have been washed but maybe DNA would still be present? I dunno. Also, even brand-new clothes get handled while on shop racks. So who knows? It will be interesting if we ever learn more details about type and location of DNA.
I just realized that Sherri is so tiny, it's unlikely she was giving men's clothing. So there goes my thrift store theory, I guess.
I tried to upload but it says my pic has an incorrect file extension.... anyone know how to fix it?
Surveillance footage from a church shows Sherri Papini running up to an on-ramp of Interstate 5 after being dropped off, per a sheriff's press release, but it was not immediately available.
Is this new? I don't remember mention of video being available before.
http://www.freep.com/story/news/loc...sherri-papini-abduction-california/799533001/
Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk
The DNA on SP's clothing, track suit could be explained away in several ways. It could have transfered from the vehicle , or as posters have stated , from the abductors clothing or even from the point of purchase.
It could become important if the same DNA could be found wherever she was held (??)
The second pic certainly looks like a man to me, even the hairline
All JMHO