logicalgirl
Peace Hawk
- Joined
- Nov 29, 2009
- Messages
- 16,024
- Reaction score
- 2
i don't either. She is worth too much to him. (I think). Her offers have gone down considerably -
No no - I want an Emergency Hearing!!!:great: Too funny!!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
i don't either. She is worth too much to him. (I think). Her offers have gone down considerably -
However SCAMP - Had KC been found guilty - the we would have seen a lot more of the truth re her personality from Baez in order to save her from death. But it never got that far. It is hard to take but it is true.
While what you say isn't false, there is no way to prove that any defense lawyer knows what is truth and what isn't based on attorney/client priviledge. It sometimes works the other way as well. A prosecutor knows they can convict a suspect on a charge, but decides to add additional charges with much less (if any) evidence. For example, a murder suspect on trial for one murder, but adding charges for two more additional murders with very little evidence to link the suspect to.
No no - I want an Emergency Hearing!!!:great: Too funny!!
The really weird thing is I often wonder if he would have done himself and his career more good if she'd been found guilty and he'd been seen as "fighting the gallant fight" for this client. I think he would have gotten the media attention and $$ he seems to crave.
The really weird thing is I often wonder if he would have done himself and his career more good if she'd been found guilty and he'd been seen as "fighting the gallant fight" for this client. I think he would have gotten the media attention and $$ he seems to crave.
JB Knew Caylee was dead, he knew she was dead from the beginning. We are not talking about other attorneys and scenarios but JB and what he should have done knowing that truth. He tried to pin this on many others before he decided on Grandpa which of course means he fabricated everything knowing Caylee was deceased and that mommy was the culprit.
I think so too.....thus the move.
I think the move to Miami is that he is going to explode in the Hispanic community after some PR rehab.
JMO
Right. That will be put into effect immediately so we can have an absolutely biased jury.
This jury had enough information with the lying and the 31 days to look at the case aND SAY ok, I think we need to spend a lot more time than a day and a half just because we don't have a video or definitive DNA.
They complained about chloroform - maybe yes maybe no. But the FBI forensics scientist said the chloroform from the rug in the cardboard box was nearly gone but still there when he got the cardboard box a month later.
That should have told them a lot. If there were remnants in a cardboard box which was open and chloroform dissipates quickly - that should have told them someone used chloroform and a lot of it.
But this was not a very bright jury - that was fairly clear from the answers.
Yes he would have. An honest attorney trying to save a life becomes priceless to the Courts and the clients. I don't think she would have been given the Death Penalty, perhaps life. That would have made him worth mega bucks and a renowned and beloved attorney.
...and IMO...something is up...we just don't know what it is yet.
IMPO, the man is a joke...verdict or no verdict.
The Pinellas Twelve weren't the sharpest crayons in the box, but HHJP's jury instructions were lacking one very important element: It was not made perfectly clear to them that they were charged with first determining Casey's guilt or innocence on the charges and not whether or not she should be sentenced to death. The decision about the DP was the second phase of their duties that would come after the verdict had been rendered - not before. I honestly believe that the jurors did not understand their duties and that HHJP was remiss in not being more explicit about this in his jury instructions. jmo
Just because someone watches the news it does not mean they are automatically biased. Plenty of people thought she might have been innocent, even if they had seen the news.
You are right that they were not a 'bright' jury. And that is a direct connection to the fact that they do not watch or listen to anything going on around them. Direct correlation, imo.
I think so too.....thus the move.
I think the move to Miami is that he is going to explode in the Hispanic community after some PR rehab.
JMO
Well.......:floorlaugh: ...........let's not get carried away here. Maybe more respect than he has now? :floorlaugh: It's Baez we're talking about....:innocent:
:floorlaugh::floorlaugh::floorlaugh:
Okay, you got me there! :crazy:
I'm gasping here - could you provide an expanded explanation here because my visuals on this are running in a Monty Python theme....:innocent:
The Florida Rules of Professional Conduct are the ethical rules that apply to attorneys in Florida. Below is the applicable section of the rules. You can judge for yourselves whether Jose Baez complied:
Rule 4-3.3 Candor Toward the Tribunal
(a) False Evidence; Duty to Disclose.
A lawyer shall not knowingly:
(1) make a false statement of material fact or law to a tribunal;
(2) fail to disclose a material fact to a tribunal when disclosure is necessary to avoid assisting a criminal or fraudulent act by the client;
(3) fail to disclose to the tribunal legal authority in the controlling jurisdiction known to the lawyer to be directly adverse to the position of the client and not disclosed by opposing counsel; or
(4) permit any witness, including a criminal defendant, to offer testimony or other evidence that the lawyer knows to be false. A lawyer may not offer testimony that the lawyer knows to be false in the form of a narrative unless so ordered by the tribunal. If a lawyer has offered material evidence and thereafter comes to know of its falsity, the lawyer shall take reasonable remedial measures.
(b) Extent of Lawyer's Duties.
The duties stated in subdivision (a) continue beyond the conclusion of the proceeding and apply even if compliance requires disclosure of information otherwise protected by rule 4-1.6.
(c) Evidence Believed to Be False.
A lawyer may refuse to offer evidence that the lawyer reasonably believes is false.
http://www.law.cornell.edu/ethics/fl/code/FL_CODE.HTM#Rule_4-3.1